National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita, KS 67214, USA.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 May;62(5):600-10. doi: 10.1002/acr.20140.
OBJECTIVE: To develop simple, practical criteria for clinical diagnosis of fibromyalgia that are suitable for use in primary and specialty care and that do not require a tender point examination, and to provide a severity scale for characteristic fibromyalgia symptoms. METHODS: We performed a multicenter study of 829 previously diagnosed fibromyalgia patients and controls using physician physical and interview examinations, including a widespread pain index (WPI), a measure of the number of painful body regions. Random forest and recursive partitioning analyses were used to guide the development of a case definition of fibromyalgia, to develop criteria, and to construct a symptom severity (SS) scale. RESULTS: Approximately 25% of fibromyalgia patients did not satisfy the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990 classification criteria at the time of the study. The most important diagnostic variables were WPI and categorical scales for cognitive symptoms, unrefreshed sleep, fatigue, and number of somatic symptoms. The categorical scales were summed to create an SS scale. We combined the SS scale and the WPI to recommend a new case definition of fibromyalgia: (WPI > or =7 AND SS > or =5) OR (WPI 3-6 AND SS > or =9). CONCLUSION: This simple clinical case definition of fibromyalgia correctly classifies 88.1% of cases classified by the ACR classification criteria, and does not require a physical or tender point examination. The SS scale enables assessment of fibromyalgia symptom severity in persons with current or previous fibromyalgia, and in those to whom the criteria have not been applied. It will be especially useful in the longitudinal evaluation of patients with marked symptom variability.
目的:制定简单实用的纤维肌痛临床诊断标准,适用于基层医疗和专科医疗,且无需进行压痛点检查,并提供特征性纤维肌痛症状严重程度的评分量表。
方法:我们对 829 例先前诊断为纤维肌痛的患者和对照者进行了多中心研究,采用了医生的体格检查和访谈检查,包括广泛疼痛指数(WPI),这是衡量身体疼痛区域数量的指标。随机森林和递归分区分析用于指导纤维肌痛病例定义的制定、标准的制定和症状严重程度(SS)量表的构建。
结果:在研究时,约 25%的纤维肌痛患者不符合美国风湿病学会(ACR)1990 年的分类标准。最重要的诊断变量是 WPI 和认知症状、睡眠不足、疲劳和躯体症状数量的分类量表。将这些分类量表进行汇总以创建 SS 量表。我们将 SS 量表和 WPI 相结合,提出了一个新的纤维肌痛病例定义:(WPI≥7 和 SS≥5)或(WPI 为 3-6 和 SS≥9)。
结论:该纤维肌痛的简单临床病例定义正确分类了 88.1%的符合 ACR 分类标准的病例,且无需进行体格检查或压痛点检查。SS 量表能够评估当前或既往有纤维肌痛以及未应用该标准的患者的纤维肌痛症状严重程度。它在对具有明显症状变异性的患者进行纵向评估时将特别有用。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010-5
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014-5-14
Ann Med. 2011-7-19
J Biomed Phys Eng. 2025-8-1