Suppr超能文献

验证 2010 年美国风湿病学会纤维肌痛初步诊断标准在伊朗人群中的适用性。

Validation of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia in an Iranian population.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran,

出版信息

Rheumatol Int. 2013 Dec;33(12):2999-3007. doi: 10.1007/s00296-013-2829-6. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to validate the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) preliminary criteria for fibromyalgia (FM) in an Iranian population. In this multicenter prospective study, we enrolled 168 FM patients and 110 controls. All participants underwent dolorimetry examination by study assessors and completed a questionnaire containing variables of both the ACR 2010 preliminary and ACR 1990 criteria. We compared the performance of the ACR 2010 criteria with the expert diagnosis as well as the ACR 1990 criteria. Receiver operator characteristic analyses and Youden index were used to evaluate the test characteristics of a set of different cutoff points for two subcomponents of ACR 2010 criteria including widespread pain index (WPI) and symptom severity (SS) scale. Considering expert diagnosis as the gold standard, the ACR 2010 criteria showed comparable specificity with ACR 1990 (92.8 vs. 88.3 %, P = 0.073), but lower sensitivity (58.9 vs. 71.4 %, P = 0.003) and a tendency for lower accuracy (72.4 vs. 78.4 %, P = 0.105). Applying the ACR 1990 criteria as the gold standard, we observed a trend toward an increase in overall accuracy (72.4 vs. 79.1 %, P = 0.064). Optimal test characteristics were achieved for WPI ≥6 and SS scale score ≥4 and improved sensitivity and accuracy of ACR 2010 criteria when compared to expert, 76.1 and 81.7, respectively. The preliminary ACR 2010 criteria performed less desirably in terms of sensitivity in our set of Iranian patients. Selecting lower cutoff points as WPI ≥6 and SS scale score ≥4 improved the diagnostic values of the criteria.

摘要

本研究旨在验证美国风湿病学会(ACR)2010 年纤维肌痛(FM)初步标准在伊朗人群中的适用性。在这项多中心前瞻性研究中,我们纳入了 168 例 FM 患者和 110 例对照者。所有参与者均由研究评估员进行压痛测量检查,并完成了一份调查问卷,其中包含 ACR 2010 年初步标准和 ACR 1990 年标准的变量。我们比较了 ACR 2010 标准的表现与专家诊断以及 ACR 1990 年标准的表现。采用受试者工作特征分析和 Youden 指数来评估 ACR 2010 标准的两个亚组(广泛疼痛指数[WPI]和症状严重程度[SS]量表)的一系列不同截断值的测试特征。考虑到专家诊断为金标准,ACR 2010 标准的特异性与 ACR 1990 标准相当(92.8%比 88.3%,P=0.073),但敏感性较低(58.9%比 71.4%,P=0.003),准确性也有降低的趋势(72.4%比 78.4%,P=0.105)。当应用 ACR 1990 标准作为金标准时,我们观察到总体准确性有提高的趋势(72.4%比 79.1%,P=0.064)。当与专家诊断相比,WPI≥6 和 SS 量表评分≥4 时,ACR 2010 标准的测试特征更优,敏感性和准确性分别为 76.1%和 81.7%。在我们的伊朗患者群体中,ACR 2010 年初步标准在敏感性方面表现欠佳。选择较低的截断值(WPI≥6 和 SS 量表评分≥4)可提高标准的诊断价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验