Suppr超能文献

度洛西汀治疗糖尿病周围神经性疼痛的安全性和耐受性:三项安慰剂对照临床试验汇总数据分析。

Safety and tolerability of duloxetine in the acute management of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain: analysis of pooled data from three placebo-controlled clinical trials.

机构信息

Abbott Laboratories, Indianapolis, USA.

出版信息

Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2010 Jul;9(4):525-37. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2010.484418.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Summarize safety and tolerability of duloxetine in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Pooled data from three double-blind, randomized studies with 12-week, placebo-controlled (acute) and 52-week, routine-care-controlled (extension) phases.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Frequency/discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

RESULTS

There were 1139 (placebo, n = 339; duloxetine, n = 800) and 867 (routine-care, n = 287; duloxetine, n = 580) patients in the acute and extension phases, respectively. Patient details were as follow: 60 years (mean age); Caucasian, 84%; and male, 57%. In the acute phase, there were significantly more TEAEs, duloxetine versus placebo (p = 0.001), the most common being nausea and somnolence. Discontinuations due to adverse events were significantly greater (12.5 vs 5.6%, p < 0.001), with similar outcomes in the extension phase. Baseline-to-endpoint aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase were significantly increased and fasting plasma glucose was increased for duloxetine (0.67 mmol/l) versus decreased in routine-care (-0.64 mmol/l, p < 0.001). HbA1c was significantly increased, duloxetine vs routine-care, in the extension phase (52 vs 19%, p < 0.001). Endpoint measures neuropathy, nephropathy and retinopathy indicated no disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Duloxetine was generally safe and well tolerated, with the three most commonly reported TEAEs being nausea, somnolence and constipation. Modest changes in glycemia were associated with duloxetine. Aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase increases were transient and not considered predictive of more severe outcomes.

摘要

目的

总结度洛西汀治疗糖尿病周围神经性疼痛的安全性和耐受性。

研究设计和方法

汇总了三项为期 12 周、安慰剂对照(急性期)和 52 周、常规治疗对照(延伸期)的双盲、随机研究的数据。

主要观察指标

因治疗相关不良事件(TEAE)而发生的频率/停药率。

结果

急性期和延伸期分别有 1139 例(安慰剂组 n=339,度洛西汀组 n=800)和 867 例(常规治疗组 n=287,度洛西汀组 n=580)患者。患者详情如下:60 岁(平均年龄);白种人,84%;男性,57%。在急性期,度洛西汀组比安慰剂组有更多的 TEAEs(p=0.001),最常见的是恶心和嗜睡。因不良事件而停药的比例明显更高(12.5% vs 5.6%,p<0.001),延伸期也有类似的结果。与基线相比,天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶/丙氨酸氨基转移酶显著升高,空腹血糖升高(度洛西汀组 0.67mmol/l),常规治疗组则降低(-0.64mmol/l,p<0.001)。在延伸期,度洛西汀组的糖化血红蛋白显著升高(与常规治疗组相比,52% vs 19%,p<0.001)。终点测量神经病变、肾病和视网膜病变表明无疾病进展。

结论

度洛西汀总体上是安全且耐受良好的,最常见的三种不良反应是恶心、嗜睡和便秘。与度洛西汀相关的血糖有适度变化。天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶/丙氨酸氨基转移酶升高是短暂的,不被认为预示更严重的结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验