van Dijk J G, Bollen E L, Slootweg J, van der Meer C M, Durian F W, Zwinderman A H
Academisch Ziekenhuis, afd. Neurologie en Klinische Neurofysiologie, Leiden.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1991 Apr 27;135(17):759-63.
Determination of the efficacy of hydroquinine treatment of the restless legs syndrome.
Double blind cross-over trial.
University Hospital Leiden.
Selection through an announcement in the press and followed by structured interview. Inclusion criteria according to the international classification of sleep disorders. Exclusion criteria defined by medication risks. Patients used either hydroquinine (200 mg in the evening and 200 mg before going to bed) or placebo in the second and fourth of four periods of two weeks duration. Severity of complaints was assessed using a daily questionnaire and a Suggested Immobilization Test (SIT) twice weekly, in which they noted the severity of complaints as experienced during a 15-minute period of immobilization.
The study was completed by 59 out of 68 patients. Analysis of variance showed no significant differences between the two groups of patients (those starting with placebo and those starting with hydroquinine) for any of the questions of the daily questionnaire or of the SIT. McNemar's test showed no significant differences between the proportions of patients who wished to continue the use of either placebo or hydroquinine.
This study showed no significant differences between the efficacy of placebo or hydroquinine in the restless legs syndrome.
确定氢醌治疗不宁腿综合征的疗效。
双盲交叉试验。
莱顿大学医院。
通过媒体公告进行筛选,随后进行结构化访谈。纳入标准依据国际睡眠障碍分类。排除标准由用药风险界定。在为期两周的四个阶段中的第二和第四阶段,患者分别使用氢醌(晚上200毫克,睡前200毫克)或安慰剂。使用每日问卷和每周两次的建议性固定试验(SIT)评估症状严重程度,患者需记录在15分钟固定期间所经历的症状严重程度。
68名患者中有59名完成了研究。方差分析表明,对于每日问卷或SIT的任何问题,两组患者(起始使用安慰剂的患者和起始使用氢醌的患者)之间均无显著差异。McNemar检验表明,希望继续使用安慰剂或氢醌的患者比例之间无显著差异。
本研究表明,安慰剂和氢醌在不宁腿综合征的疗效上无显著差异。