Institute for Health and Society, Université Catholique de Louvain, clos chapelle aux champs 30.41, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgium.
Eur J Public Health. 2011 Apr;21(2):235-40. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq061. Epub 2010 May 16.
Ethnic-minority health is a public health priority in Europe. This study compares strategies for tackling ethnic inequalities in health from two countries, Scotland and Belgium.
We compared the countries using the Whitehead framework. Official policy documents were retrieved and reviewed and two databases related to immigrant health policies were also used. Ethnic inequalities in health were compared using the UK and Belgian Censuses of 2001. We analysed the recognition of the problem, the policies and the services and described ethnic health inequalities.
Scotland has recognized the problem of ethnic inequalities in health, thanks to better data and the Scottish Government has come up with a bold strategy. Belgium is a later starter, unable to properly monitor ethnic inequalities. In addition, there is no clear government commitment to tackling either health inequalities or ethnic inequalities in health. Both countries provide health-care services to ethnic minority groups through the mainstream services, although ethnic minority groups have more choice in Belgium than in Scotland. Overall, ethnic heath inequalities are lower in Scotland than in Belgium.
Scotland has provided a more advanced and comprehensive response to tackling ethnic inequalities in health than Belgium. It has acknowledged that discrimination exists and that ethnic minority groups may have different needs. Belgium still assumes non-discrimination in health care and effectively denies the need for policy to tailor services to meet these needs. In Scotland, public organizations have been made accountable for promoting equality in health. This is an important contribution to European health policy.
少数民族健康是欧洲公共卫生的重点。本研究比较了来自苏格兰和比利时这两个国家的解决健康方面种族不平等问题的策略。
我们使用 Whitehead 框架对这两个国家进行了比较。检索并审查了官方政策文件,并使用了两个与移民健康政策相关的数据库。使用 2001 年英国和比利时的人口普查数据比较了健康方面的种族不平等现象。我们分析了对问题的认识、政策和服务,并描述了种族健康不平等。
苏格兰由于数据更好,已经认识到健康方面种族不平等的问题,苏格兰政府也提出了大胆的策略。比利时起步较晚,无法正确监测种族不平等问题。此外,无论是解决健康不平等问题还是健康方面的种族不平等问题,政府都没有明确的承诺。两国都通过主流服务向少数族裔群体提供医疗保健服务,尽管在比利时,少数族裔群体比苏格兰有更多的选择。总体而言,苏格兰的种族健康不平等程度低于比利时。
苏格兰在解决健康方面的种族不平等问题上比比利时提供了更先进和全面的应对措施。它承认存在歧视,并且少数民族群体可能有不同的需求。比利时仍然假设医疗保健中不存在歧视,并实际上否认有必要制定政策来调整服务以满足这些需求。在苏格兰,公共组织已经被要求在促进健康平等方面承担责任。这是对欧洲卫生政策的重要贡献。