Putz Mihai V
Chemistry Department, West University of Timişoara, Romania.
Int J Mol Sci. 2010 Mar 26;11(4):1269-310. doi: 10.3390/ijms11041269.
A new aromaticity definition is advanced as the compactness formulation through the ratio between atoms-in-molecule and orbital molecular facets of the same chemical reactivity property around the pre- and post-bonding stabilization limit, respectively. Geometrical reactivity index of polarizability was assumed as providing the benchmark aromaticity scale, since due to its observable character; with this occasion new Hydrogenic polarizability quantum formula that recovers the exact value of 4.5 a(0) (3) for Hydrogen is provided, where a(0) is the Bohr radius; a polarizability based-aromaticity scale enables the introduction of five referential aromatic rules (Aroma 1 to 5 Rules). With the help of these aromatic rules, the aromaticity scales based on energetic reactivity indices of electronegativity and chemical hardness were computed and analyzed within the major semi-empirical and ab initio quantum chemical methods. Results show that chemical hardness based-aromaticity is in better agreement with polarizability based-aromaticity than the electronegativity-based aromaticity scale, while the most favorable computational environment appears to be the quantum semi-empirical for the first and quantum ab initio for the last of them, respectively.
一种新的芳香性定义被提出,即通过分子中原子与分子轨道面的比率来定义紧凑性,该比率分别围绕键合前后的稳定极限,且具有相同的化学反应性质。由于其可观测性,极化率的几何反应性指数被假定为提供基准芳香性标度;在此情况下,提供了新的氢极化率量子公式,该公式恢复了氢的精确值4.5 a(0) (3),其中a(0)是玻尔半径;基于极化率的芳香性标度使得能够引入五条参考芳香规则(芳香规则1至5)。借助这些芳香规则,在主要的半经验和从头算量子化学方法中,计算并分析了基于电负性和化学硬度的能量反应性指数的芳香性标度。结果表明,基于化学硬度的芳香性比基于电负性的芳香性标度与基于极化率的芳香性更一致,而最有利的计算环境分别对于前者似乎是量子半经验方法,对于后者是量子从头算方法。