• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比利时孤儿药的预算影响分析:2008 年至 2013 年的估计。

Budget impact analysis of orphan drugs in Belgium: estimates from 2008 to 2013.

机构信息

Yellow Window Management Consultants, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2010;13(2):295-301. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2010.491427.

DOI:10.3111/13696998.2010.491427
PMID:20482245
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to calculate the impact of orphan drugs on the Belgian drug budget in 2008 and to forecast its impact over the following 5 years.

METHOD

The 2008 budget impact was calculated by triangulating information derived from multiple Belgian data sources. The 2008-2013 budget impact analysis was based on three scenarios reflecting different levels of growth in the number of registered orphan drugs in the European Union, the number of drugs reimbursed in Belgium, and the average annual cost per patient per drug in Belgium.

RESULTS

The orphan drug budget impact amounted to €66.2 million (or 5% of the Belgian hospital drug budget) in 2008. The impact would increase to €130-204 million in 2013, depending on the scenario.

CONCLUSIONS

This static analysis measured orphan drug costs only, assuming that other components of health expenditure do not change over time. The analysis showed that the budget impact of orphan drugs in Belgium is substantial and rising, thereby putting pressure on total drug expenditure. Policy options to address the rising budget impact include pricing linked to return on investment, risk-sharing arrangements and re-appraisal of orphan drug status if additional indications are approved.

摘要

目的

本文旨在计算 2008 年孤儿药对比利时药品预算的影响,并预测未来 5 年的影响。

方法

通过对来自多个比利时数据来源的信息进行三角测量,计算了 2008 年的预算影响。2008-2013 年的预算影响分析基于三种情景,反映了欧盟注册孤儿药数量、比利时报销药品数量以及比利时每名患者每种药品平均年度费用的不同增长水平。

结果

2008 年孤儿药预算影响为 6620 万欧元(占比利时医院药品预算的 5%)。根据不同的情景,2013 年的影响将增加到 1.30 亿至 2.04 亿欧元。

结论

这项静态分析仅衡量了孤儿药的成本,假设其他卫生支出部分不会随时间变化。分析表明,比利时孤儿药的预算影响是巨大的,而且还在不断上升,从而给总药品支出带来压力。解决预算影响不断上升的政策选择包括与投资回报挂钩的定价、风险分担安排以及在批准额外适应症时重新评估孤儿药地位。

相似文献

1
Budget impact analysis of orphan drugs in Belgium: estimates from 2008 to 2013.比利时孤儿药的预算影响分析:2008 年至 2013 年的估计。
J Med Econ. 2010;13(2):295-301. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2010.491427.
2
Budget impact analysis of adjunctive therapy with lacosamide for partial-onset epileptic seizures in Belgium.在比利时,使用拉科酰胺辅助治疗部分发作性癫痫发作的预算影响分析。
J Med Econ. 2011;14(3):299-304. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.577852. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
3
Orphan drugs and the NHS: should we value rarity?孤儿药与英国国家医疗服务体系:我们应该重视罕见病吗?
BMJ. 2005 Oct 29;331(7523):1016-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7523.1016.
4
Budget impact analysis of drugs for ultra-orphan non-oncological diseases in Europe.在欧洲,用于超孤儿非肿瘤疾病的药物的预算影响分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Feb;15(1):171-9. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2015.965156. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
5
Orphan drugs expenditure in the Netherlands in the period 2006-2012.2006年至2012年期间荷兰的罕见病药物支出。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014 Oct 11;9:154. doi: 10.1186/s13023-014-0154-0.
6
Impact of orphan drugs on Latvian budget.罕见病药物对拉脱维亚预算的影响。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 May 11;11(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0434-y.
7
[Orphan drugs: drugs for rare diseases].[孤儿药:用于罕见病的药物]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2010 May;135(18):p17.
8
[Orphan drugs: some legal, ethical and economics aspects].[孤儿药:一些法律、伦理和经济学方面的问题]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2001 Sep;49(4):387-96.
9
Beware the increasing cost and number of orphan drugs.谨防孤儿药成本不断上升且数量不断增加的情况。
Manag Care. 2013 Mar;22(3):10-4.
10
Critical assessment of belgian reimbursement dossiers of orphan drugs.比利时孤儿药报销文件的批判性评估。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Oct;29(10):883-93. doi: 10.2165/11585980-000000000-00000.

引用本文的文献

1
Projections of Public Spending on Pharmaceuticals: A Review of Methods.药品公共支出预测:方法综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Apr;43(4):375-388. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01465-w. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
2
A systematic review of moral reasons on orphan drug reimbursement.孤儿药补偿的道德理由系统评价。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Jun 30;16(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-01925-y.
3
Methodological Quality Assessment of Budget Impact Analyses for Orphan Drugs: A Systematic Review.罕见病药物预算影响分析的方法学质量评估:一项系统评价
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Apr 21;12:630949. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.630949. eCollection 2021.
4
Public spending on orphan medicines: a review of the literature.孤儿药的公共支出:文献综述
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2020 Oct 13;13:66. doi: 10.1186/s40545-020-00260-0. eCollection 2020.
5
Patient Accessibility and Budget Impact of Orphan Drugs in South Korea: Long-Term and Real-World Data Analysis (2007-2019).韩国孤儿药的患者可及性和预算影响:长期真实世界数据分析(2007-2019)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 26;17(9):2991. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17092991.
6
Negotiating prices of drugs for rare diseases.罕见病药物的价格谈判。
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Oct 1;94(10):779-781. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.163519. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
7
Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries.中东欧国家罕见病药物评估标准的系统评价
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 Jun 4;11(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0455-6.
8
Pharmaceutical expenditure on drugs for rare diseases in Canada: a historical (2007-13) and prospective (2014-18) MIDAS sales data analysis.加拿大罕见病药物的药品支出:一项基于MIDAS销售数据的历史(2007 - 2013年)及前瞻性(2014 - 2018年)分析
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 May 21;11(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0450-y.
9
Impact of orphan drugs on Latvian budget.罕见病药物对拉脱维亚预算的影响。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 May 11;11(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0434-y.
10
Can the EVIDEM Framework Tackle Issues Raised by Evaluating Treatments for Rare Diseases: Analysis of Issues and Policies, and Context-Specific Adaptation.EVIDEM框架能否解决评估罕见病治疗方法所引发的问题:问题与政策分析以及因地制宜的调整
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Mar;34(3):285-301. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0340-5.