Tinacci G, Biggeri A, Pellegrini A, Cariaggi M P, Schiboni M L, Confortini M
Pathology Unit, Laboratory Medicine Department, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Cytopathology. 2011 Apr;22(2):75-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2010.00753.x. Epub 2010 May 12.
The aim of this study was to measure interobserver agreement among cytologists on using a set of digital images.
A set of 90 selected Papanicolaou-stained cervical smears were digitalized and the digital images circulated among 117 readers, from laboratories spread across almost all Italian regions. Three representative fields of each smear were displayed at 20× and 40× magnification (overall six images for each case). The diagnoses made by the cytologists who provided the images were taken as target diagnoses.
The κ values were: very low for the categories atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), and atypical squamous cells - cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H); poor for the categories atypical glandular cells (AGC), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and invasive cancer; and fair to good for the categories negative and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL). However, we found a cluster of 42 best concordant readers. The overall κ value and overall weighted κ with the target diagnosis for these 42 readers were 0.45 and 0.66, respectively. This finding is in contrast with the overall κ value and overall weighted κ for the other readers of 0.39 and 0.59, respectively.
As this finding is an estimate of the accuracy of the readers, we can infer that it will be very important to reach this level of concordance for all the participating readers. Future effort will facilitate common experiences in order to improve the reproducibility of diagnostic criteria. Digital images could be the key to reach this aim.
本研究旨在衡量细胞学家在使用一组数字图像时的观察者间一致性。
选取90份巴氏染色的宫颈涂片进行数字化处理,并将数字图像分发给来自几乎所有意大利地区实验室的117名读者。每份涂片的三个代表性视野分别以20倍和40倍放大倍数显示(每个病例共六张图像)。提供图像的细胞学家所做出的诊断被视为目标诊断。
κ值如下:意义不明确的非典型鳞状细胞(ASC-US)和非典型鳞状细胞 - 不能排除高级别鳞状上皮内病变(ASC-H)类别为非常低;非典型腺细胞(AGC)、高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)和浸润癌类别为差;阴性和低级别鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)类别为一般到良好。然而,我们发现了一组42名一致性最佳的读者。这42名读者与目标诊断的总体κ值和总体加权κ值分别为0.45和0.66。这一发现与其他读者的总体κ值和总体加权κ值分别为0.39和0.59形成对比。
由于这一发现是对读者准确性的一种估计,我们可以推断,对于所有参与的读者来说,达到这种一致性水平将非常重要。未来的努力将促进共同经验,以提高诊断标准的可重复性。数字图像可能是实现这一目标的关键。