Sutherland S S, Ellis T M, Edwards J R
Department of Agriculture, Baron-Hay Court, South Perth, Australia.
Vet Microbiol. 1991 Mar;27(1):91-9. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(91)90065-n.
Intradermal vaccination of live crude filaments (vaccine A) was compared with a vaccine (vaccine B) consisting of a 45 kD zoospore protein and mucoid material coating filaments in its ability to protect sheep from experimental Dermatophilus congolensis infection. Fourteen and 21 days after challenge, vaccine A sheep had fewer lesions (P less than 0.001) than the vaccine B sheep. The lesions on the vaccine A sheep were also less severe 14 and 21 days after challenge (P less than 0.05, P less than 0.01 respectively). In a second study, vaccine A was assessed for its ability to protect against natural challenge. Ten weeks after contact with sheep with active and generalised dermatophilosis no difference was found between the number of lesions present on the vaccine A and unvaccinated sheep and no differences were found in the number of sheep in each group with active lesions.
将活的粗丝(疫苗A)皮内接种与由45kD游动孢子蛋白和包裹粗丝的粘液样物质组成的疫苗(疫苗B)在保护绵羊免受实验性刚果嗜皮菌感染方面的能力进行了比较。攻击后14天和21天,接种疫苗A的绵羊比接种疫苗B的绵羊病变更少(P小于0.001)。攻击后14天和21天,接种疫苗A的绵羊的病变也较轻(分别为P小于0.05,P小于0.01)。在第二项研究中,评估了疫苗A预防自然攻击的能力。与患有活动性全身性嗜皮菌病的绵羊接触10周后,接种疫苗A的绵羊和未接种疫苗的绵羊出现的病变数量没有差异,每组有活动性病变的绵羊数量也没有差异。