• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与癌症患儿可选药代动力学研究的原因:一项儿童肿瘤学组 1 期联盟研究。

Reasons for participation in optional pharmacokinetic studies in children with cancer: a Children's Oncology Group phase 1 consortium study.

机构信息

Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010 Jul 15;55(1):119-22. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22529.

DOI:10.1002/pbc.22529
PMID:20486176
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2911979/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies provide critical information about the disposition of anticancer drugs in children. In the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Phase 1 Consortium, pharmacokinetic studies are usually optional. We surveyed the attitudes towards PK studies among subjects in phase 1 trials at COG institutions.

METHODS

Subjects were eligible if they participated in a phase 1 anticancer drug study with optional PK studies within the 4 weeks, regardless of whether they agreed to participate in the PK studies. Staff provided demographics; subjects/parents completed a questionnaire.

RESULTS

Fifty eligible subjects enrolled. Thirty-six (72%) of the 50 eligible subjects consented to participate in PK studies; 14 (25%) declined. The most common reasons for participating were "the results might help researchers learn more about the drug" and "results from the pharmacokinetic studies might help other children." The most common reasons for not participating were "having the samples drawn would mean spending extra time in the hospital," and "my child might have needed a separate IV catheter in order to participate."

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of subjects identified altruistic motives for participation in PK studies. Subjects who did not participate in PK studies identified extra time and need for an extra IV as important concerns. Simple interventions like sending staff to the subjects' home to draw PK samples or drawing samples from existing catheters could increase the number of subjects who are willing to participate in PK studies.

摘要

目的

药代动力学(PK)研究提供了关于儿童中抗癌药物处置的关键信息。在儿童肿瘤学组(COG)1 期联盟中,PK 研究通常是可选的。我们调查了 COG 机构 1 期试验中受试者对 PK 研究的态度。

方法

如果受试者在 4 周内参加了有可选 PK 研究的 1 期抗癌药物研究,无论他们是否同意参加 PK 研究,均符合入选条件。工作人员提供人口统计学资料;受试者/家长完成问卷调查。

结果

共纳入 50 名合格受试者。50 名合格受试者中,36 名(72%)同意参加 PK 研究;14 名(25%)拒绝。参加的最常见原因是“结果可能有助于研究人员更多地了解药物”和“PK 研究的结果可能有助于其他孩子”。不参加的最常见原因是“抽取样本意味着要在医院花费额外的时间”和“我的孩子可能需要额外的静脉导管才能参加”。

结论

大多数受试者认为参加 PK 研究是出于利他主义动机。未参加 PK 研究的受试者认为额外的时间和额外 IV 导管的需求是重要的关注点。简单的干预措施,如派遣工作人员到受试者家中抽取 PK 样本或从现有导管中抽取样本,可能会增加愿意参加 PK 研究的受试者数量。

相似文献

1
Reasons for participation in optional pharmacokinetic studies in children with cancer: a Children's Oncology Group phase 1 consortium study.参与癌症患儿可选药代动力学研究的原因:一项儿童肿瘤学组 1 期联盟研究。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010 Jul 15;55(1):119-22. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22529.
2
Modeling and simulation approaches to evaluate pharmacokinetic sampling contamination from central venous catheters in pediatric pharmacokinetic studies of actinomycin-D: a report from the children's oncology group.模型和模拟方法评估多柔比星儿科药代动力学研究中中心静脉导管引起的药代动力学采样污染:来自儿童肿瘤组的报告。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012 Jul;70(1):83-94. doi: 10.1007/s00280-012-1878-y. Epub 2012 May 24.
3
Hope for a cure and altruism are the main motives behind participation in phase 3 clinical cancer trials.对治愈的希望和利他主义是参与癌症三期临床试验背后的主要动机。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015;24(1):133-41. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12184. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
4
Altruism among participants in cancer clinical trials.癌症临床试验参与者中的利他主义。
Clin Trials. 2011 Oct;8(5):616-23. doi: 10.1177/1740774511414444. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
5
Preconsent education about research processes improved African Americans' willingness to participate in clinical research.预先告知研究过程能提高非裔美国人参与临床研究的意愿。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;64(8):872-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.008. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
6
Population pharmacokinetics of temsirolimus and sirolimus in children with recurrent solid tumours: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.替西罗莫司和西罗莫司在复发性实体瘤儿童中的群体药代动力学:来自儿童肿瘤学组的报告。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 May;83(5):1097-1107. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13181. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
7
Parental Experiences of Child Participation in a Phase I Pediatric Oncology Clinical Trial: "We Don't Have Time to Waste".家长参与儿科肿瘤 I 期临床试验的体验:“我们浪费不起时间”。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Apr;29(5):632-644. doi: 10.1177/1049732318766513. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
8
Factors influencing childhood cancer patients to participate in a combined physical and psychosocial intervention program: Quality of Life in Motion.影响儿童癌症患者参与身心综合干预项目“运动中的生活质量”的因素
Psychooncology. 2015 Apr;24(4):465-71. doi: 10.1002/pon.3677. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
9
Investigating the Experiences of Childhood Cancer Patients and Parents Participating in Optional Nontherapeutic Clinical Research Studies in the UK.调查英国儿童癌症患者及其父母参与非治疗性临床研究的经历。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016 Jul;63(7):1193-7. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25960. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
10
Experiences of families with a child, adolescent, or young adult with neurofibromatosis type 1 and plexiform neurofibroma evaluated for clinical trials participation at the National Cancer Institute.国家癌症研究所评估参与临床试验的 1 型神经纤维瘤病和丛状神经纤维瘤患儿、青少年或青年患者家庭的体验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 Jan;32(1):10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.10.004. Epub 2010 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Influencing Participation Of Healthy Volunteers In Clinical Trials: Findings From A Cross-Sectional Study In Delhi, North India.影响健康志愿者参与临床试验的因素:印度北部德里横断面研究的结果
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Nov 29;13:2007-2015. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S206728. eCollection 2019.
2
Provocative questions in osteosarcoma basic and translational biology: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.成骨肉瘤基础与转化生物学中的挑战性问题:儿童肿瘤学组的报告。
Cancer. 2019 Oct 15;125(20):3514-3525. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32351. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
3
US Military Service Members' Reasons for Deciding to Participate in Health Research.美国军人决定参与健康研究的原因。
Res Nurs Health. 2017 Jun;40(3):263-272. doi: 10.1002/nur.21785. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
4
Motivations of children and their parents to participate in drug research: a systematic review.儿童及其父母参与药物研究的动机:一项系统综述。
Eur J Pediatr. 2016 May;175(5):599-612. doi: 10.1007/s00431-016-2715-9. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
5
Investigating the Experiences of Childhood Cancer Patients and Parents Participating in Optional Nontherapeutic Clinical Research Studies in the UK.调查英国儿童癌症患者及其父母参与非治疗性临床研究的经历。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016 Jul;63(7):1193-7. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25960. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
6
The complexity of consenting to clinical research in phase I pediatric cancer studies.在儿科癌症一期研究中同意参与临床研究的复杂性。
Paediatr Drugs. 2015 Feb;17(1):77-81. doi: 10.1007/s40272-014-0113-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Performing nondiagnostic research biopsies in irradiated tissue: a review of scientific, clinical, and ethical considerations.在受辐照组织中进行非诊断性研究活检:科学、临床及伦理考量综述
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 20;26(24):3987-94. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.9896.
2
Constitutional law--substantive due process--en banc D.C. Circuit rejects fundamental right to experimental medications.--Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695 (D.C. Cir. 2007)(en banc), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 1069 (2008).宪法——实质性正当程序——美国哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院全体法官庭审驳回获得试验性药物的基本权利。——阿比盖尔更好获取发展性药物联盟诉冯·埃申巴赫案,《联邦判例汇编》第三辑第495卷,第695页(美国哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院,2007年)(全体法官庭审),最高法院调卷令申请被驳回,《美国最高法院判例汇编》第128卷,第1069页(2008年)。
Harv Law Rev. 2008 Apr;121(6):1685-92.
3
Phase I participants' views of quality of life and trial participation burdens.I期试验参与者对生活质量和试验参与负担的看法。
Support Care Cancer. 2007 Jul;15(7):885-90. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0216-0.
4
Impact and perceptions of mandatory tumor biopsies for correlative studies in clinical trials of novel anticancer agents.新型抗癌药物临床试验中用于相关性研究的强制性肿瘤活检的影响及认知
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 20;24(30):4801-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.4496.
5
Altruistic motives reconsidered.利他动机再思考。
Am J Bioeth. 2006 Sep-Oct;6(5):55-6. doi: 10.1080/15265160600862940.
6
Altruistic discourse and therapeutic misconception in research informed consent.研究知情同意中的利他主义话语与治疗性误解。
Am J Bioeth. 2006 Sep-Oct;6(5):53-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160600862924.
7
The role of altruism in parental decision-making for childhood cancer clinical trials--further questions to explore.利他主义在儿童癌症临床试验家长决策中的作用——有待探索的更多问题
Am J Bioeth. 2006 Sep-Oct;6(5):52. doi: 10.1080/15265160600862528.
8
Can children be altruistic research subjects?
Am J Bioeth. 2006 Sep-Oct;6(5):49-50. doi: 10.1080/15265160600862445.
9
Altruism and pediatric oncology trials: it does not tip the decision-making scales.利他主义与儿科肿瘤学试验:它并不会影响决策天平。
Am J Bioeth. 2006 Sep-Oct;6(5):48. doi: 10.1080/15265160600862429.
10
Altruistic discourse in the informed consent process for childhood cancer clinical trials.
Am J Bioeth. 2006 Sep-Oct;6(5):40-7. doi: 10.1080/15265160600862395.