RiskMR Pharmacovigilance Services, Zaragoza, Spain.
Drug Saf. 2010 Jun 1;33(6):489-501. doi: 10.2165/11532550-000000000-00000.
The infliximab (Remicade; Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ, USA) Risk Management Plan included the development, execution and tracking of an education programme directed towards prescribers of infliximab for patients with paediatric Crohn's disease (the Infliximab Paediatric Crohn's Disease Educational Plan). The programme content consisted of educational materials and communications aimed at educating prescribers on the risks associated with infliximab use.
To evaluate the effectiveness of the risk minimization plan.
Evaluation focused on two components: documentation of training of sponsors' personnel, and evaluation of awareness among prescribing physicians in European countries. Treating physicians, identified both independently of the sponsor (6 countries) and by the sponsor (24 countries), were surveyed using a structured questionnaire.
Training of internal staff on the educational programme was performed and completed by every person designated an appropriate candidate for the programme in all European countries. The independent survey conducted in Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Sweden and the UK indicated that around 90% of the physicians were either paediatric gastroenterologists (57%) or paediatricians (33%). The great majority (96%) of the interviewed physicians were currently treating paediatric Crohn's disease, and most were currently using infliximab in their treatment of the disease. More specifically, 82% of gastroentrologists treating paediatric Crohn's disease were using infliximab; among paediatricians, the proportion was lower (42%). Ninety-six percent of paediatric gastroenterologists or gastroenterologists declared themselves aware of the benefits and risks of using infliximab for the treatment of paediatric Crohn's disease; in comparison, fewer paediatricians (82%) declared themselves aware of these benefits and risks. The majority initially gained awareness through congresses and workshops, and at the time of the survey only 25% declared that they were made aware of the benefits and risks through the educational programme. However, the majority of physicians reported that they had been approached by the sponsor's personnel in France (98%), Italy (100%), Spain (83%) and Sweden (70%). In Germany and the UK this proportion was 42%. Almost all physicians were aware of the need to perform tuberculosis (TB) and cancer screening prior to initiating therapy with infliximab, and to screen for hypersensitivity reactions before, during and after treatment. Ninety percent of the physicians were aware of the need to update immunization therapy before initiating therapy and, except in Italy (92% aware), around 50% of the physicians were aware of the need to provide patients with the infliximab Patient Alert Card. In the other European countries where the survey took place among physicians identified by the sponsor, 99% of paediatric gastroenterologists and 90% of gastroenterologists or paediatricians declared themselves aware of the benefits and risks of using infliximab for the treatment of paediatric Crohn's disease, and all of them were aware of the risk of TB and opportunistic infections and the need to perform TB and cancer screening prior to initiating therapy with infliximab.
Overall, the results of the evaluation of the Infliximab Paediatric Crohn's Disease Educational Plan were satisfactory. The objective of education of internal personnel of the pharmaceutical companies distributing infliximab was completely achieved; over 90% of physicians reported being aware of the benefits and risks of infliximab for the treatment of paediatric Crohn's disease. Further work should be carried out across all countries to educate physicians on providing patients with the infliximab Patient Alert Card. In Germany and the UK in particular, where <50% of physicians reported having been approached by the sponsor's personnel, further work is needed to raise awareness of the educational programme.
英夫利昔单抗(Remicade;先灵葆雅,美国新泽西州肯利沃斯)风险管理计划包括制定、执行和跟踪旨在向英夫利昔单抗治疗小儿克罗恩病的处方医生提供教育的计划(英夫利昔单抗小儿克罗恩病教育计划)。该计划的内容包括旨在教育医生与英夫利昔单抗使用相关风险的教育材料和沟通。
评估风险最小化计划的有效性。
评估重点关注两个方面:赞助商人员培训记录,以及欧洲国家处方医生的意识评估。使用结构化问卷对独立(6 个国家)和由赞助商识别(24 个国家)的治疗医生进行调查。
在所有欧洲国家,内部员工都接受了教育计划的培训,并由每位被指定为该计划合适人选的员工完成。在德国、法国、意大利、西班牙、瑞典和英国进行的独立调查表明,约 90%的医生是儿科胃肠病学家(57%)或儿科医生(33%)。大多数(96%)接受采访的医生目前正在治疗小儿克罗恩病,大多数医生目前正在使用英夫利昔单抗治疗该疾病。具体来说,82%治疗小儿克罗恩病的胃肠病学家正在使用英夫利昔单抗;儿科医生的比例较低(42%)。96%的儿科胃肠病学家或胃肠病学家表示他们了解使用英夫利昔单抗治疗小儿克罗恩病的益处和风险;相比之下,较少的儿科医生(82%)表示他们了解这些益处和风险。大多数医生最初通过大会和研讨会获得了意识,而在调查时,只有 25%的医生表示他们通过教育计划了解了这些益处和风险。然而,大多数医生报告说,他们在法国(98%)、意大利(100%)、西班牙(83%)和瑞典(70%)都曾被赞助商的人员联系过。在德国和英国,这一比例为 42%。几乎所有医生都知道在开始英夫利昔单抗治疗前需要进行结核病(TB)和癌症筛查,并在治疗前、治疗中和治疗后进行过敏反应筛查。90%的医生都知道在开始治疗前需要更新免疫治疗,除了意大利(92%的人知道),约 50%的医生都知道需要向患者提供英夫利昔单抗患者警示卡。在进行由赞助商识别的医生调查的其他欧洲国家中,99%的儿科胃肠病学家和 90%的胃肠病学家或儿科医生表示他们了解使用英夫利昔单抗治疗小儿克罗恩病的益处和风险,并且他们都知道结核病和机会性感染的风险,以及在开始英夫利昔单抗治疗前进行结核病和癌症筛查的必要性。
总体而言,英夫利昔单抗小儿克罗恩病教育计划的评估结果令人满意。制药公司内部人员教育的目标完全实现;超过 90%的医生报告说了解英夫利昔单抗治疗小儿克罗恩病的益处和风险。应在所有国家开展进一步工作,教育医生向患者提供英夫利昔单抗患者警示卡。特别是在德国和英国,不到 50%的医生报告曾被赞助商人员联系过,需要进一步开展工作,提高对教育计划的认识。