Department of Neurosurgery, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
J Neurosurg. 2010 Nov;113(5):1011-8. doi: 10.3171/2010.4.JNS091887. Epub 2010 May 21.
The authors describe a modified Le Fort I maxillotomy with medial and posterior antrectomy and removal of the pterygoid plates, aimed at improving the lateral surgical exposure during open transmaxillary surgery for pathological conditions involving the clivus. A cadaveric microanatomical study was conducted to compare the planimetric exposures allowed by the transmaxillary transpterygoid (TMTP) approach and the standard Le Fort I maxillotomy (STM).
Six cadaveric specimens that had been fixed with glutaraldehyde and injected with latex were dissected to obtain morphometric measurements after both TMTP and STM approaches. The anatomical areas exposed by the surgical approaches were calculated using ImageJ 1.37a software.
As expected, the TMTP approach allowed for a greater surgical exposure, with an incremental area exposed ranging from 4.9 to 7.6 cm(2) (mean ± standard deviation 6.4 ± 1.2 cm(2), 95% CI 5.4-7.4 cm(2)). The amount of additional anatomical area visualized, as recorded as a percentage increase after the TMTP approach when compared with the STM approach, ranged from 83 to 109% (mean 99%).
The lateral surgical exposure allowed by the STM approach is limited by the pterygoid plates. The TMTP approach significantly improves the exposure of the anatomical regions lateral to the clivus, allowing access to the pterygopalatine and medial infratemporal fossae. In comparison with the STM, the TMTP approach allows for a surgical exposure that is nearly double. The authors conclude that the TMTP approach provides a significant improvement in the surgical exposure of the lateral paraclival areas, when compared with the STM approach.
作者描述了一种改良的 Le Fort I 上颌骨切开术,联合内侧和后向经蝶窦切开术以及翼板切除术,旨在改善经上颌窦开放式经颅手术中涉及斜坡病变的外侧手术暴露。进行了一项尸体显微解剖研究,以比较经上颌经蝶窦(TMTP)入路和标准 Le Fort I 上颌骨切开术(STM)允许的平面暴露。
对经过戊二醛固定和乳胶注射的 6 具尸体标本进行解剖,在 TMTP 和 STM 入路后获得形态测量值。使用 ImageJ 1.37a 软件计算手术入路暴露的解剖区域。
正如预期的那样,TMTP 入路允许更大的手术暴露,暴露面积增加 4.9 至 7.6cm²(平均值 ± 标准差 6.4 ± 1.2cm²,95%置信区间 5.4-7.4cm²)。与 TMTP 入路相比,经 TMTP 入路可额外观察到的解剖区域量记录为百分比增加,范围为 83%至 109%(平均值 99%)。
STM 入路允许的外侧手术暴露受翼板限制。TMTP 入路可显著改善斜坡侧解剖区域的暴露,可进入翼腭窝和内侧颞下窝。与 STM 相比,TMTP 入路可实现近两倍的手术暴露。作者得出结论,与 STM 入路相比,TMTP 入路可显著改善外侧斜坡旁区域的手术暴露。