Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
J Neurosurg. 2011 Jan;114(1):217-24. doi: 10.3171/2010.4.JNS091969. Epub 2010 May 21.
The mechanism responsible for exceptional examples of intraneural ganglia with extensive longitudinal involvement has not been understood. Such cases of intraneural cysts, seemingly remote from a joint, have been thought not to have articular connections. Decompression and attempted resection of the cyst has led to intraneural recurrence and poor neurological recovery. The purpose of this report is not only to clarify the pathogenesis of these cysts, but also to discuss their treatment based on modern concepts of intraneural ganglia.
Two examples of extreme longitudinal propagation of intraneural ganglia are presented.
A patient with a moderate tibial neuropathy was found to have a tibial intraneural ganglion. Prospective interpretation of the MR imaging study demonstrated the cyst's origin from the posterior portion of the superior tibiofibular joint (STFJ), with proximal extension within the sciatic nerve to the lower buttock region. Communication between the STFJ and the cyst was confirmed with direct knee MR arthrography. The tibial intraneural cyst was treated successfully by a relatively limited exposure in the distal popliteal fossa: the cyst was decompressed, the articular branch disconnected, and the STFJ resected. Postoperatively, the patient improved neurologically and there was no evidence of recurrent cyst on postoperative MR imaging. A second patient, previously reported by another group, was reexamined 22 years after surgery. This patient had an extensive peroneal intraneural ganglion that extended into the sciatic nerve from the knee to the buttock; no joint connection or recurrent cyst had initially been described. In this patient, the authors hypothesized and established with MR imaging the presence of both: a joint connection to the anterior portion of the STFJ from the peroneal articular branch as well as recurrent cyst within the peroneal and tibial nerves.
This paper demonstrates that extreme intraneural cysts are not clinical outliers but represent extreme examples of other more typical intraneural cysts. They logically obey the same principles, previously described in the unified articular (synovial) theory. The degree of longitudinal extension is probably due to high intraarticular pressures within the degenerative joint of origin. The generalizability of the mechanistic principles is highlighted by the fact that these 2 cases, involving the tibial and the peroneal nerve respectively, both extended well distant (that is, to the buttock) from the STFJ via their respective articular branch of origin. These extensive intraneural cysts can be treated successfully by disconnecting the affected articular branch and by resection of the joint of origin, rather than by a more aggressive operation resecting the cyst and cyst wall.
负责神经内神经节异常广泛纵向参与的机制尚不清楚。这种看似远离关节的神经内囊肿,被认为与关节无连接。囊肿减压和尝试切除导致神经内复发和神经功能恢复不良。本报告的目的不仅在于阐明这些囊肿的发病机制,而且还在于根据神经内神经节的现代概念讨论其治疗方法。
介绍了两个极端纵向传播的神经内神经节的例子。
一名中度胫骨神经病患者发现胫骨内神经节。前瞻性解释磁共振成像研究表明,囊肿起源于胫腓上关节(STFJ)的后部分,近端在坐骨神经内延伸至臀部下部区域。直接膝关节磁共振关节造影术证实了 STFJ 与囊肿之间的连通。通过在腓肠窝的远端进行相对有限的暴露成功治疗了胫骨内神经囊肿:减压囊肿,断开关节分支,并切除 STFJ。术后患者神经功能改善,术后磁共振成像无囊肿复发证据。第二个患者由另一组先前报道,在手术后 22 年重新检查。该患者有一个广泛的腓总神经内神经节,从膝关节延伸至臀部的坐骨神经; 最初没有描述关节连接或复发性囊肿。在该患者中,作者假设并通过磁共振成像证实了存在两者:来自腓骨关节分支的 STFJ 前部的关节连接以及腓总神经和胫骨神经内的复发性囊肿。
本文证明,极端的神经内囊肿不是临床异常,而是代表其他更典型的神经内囊肿的极端例子。它们逻辑上遵循相同的原则,这些原则以前在统一关节(滑膜)理论中有所描述。纵向延伸的程度可能是由于起源退行性关节内的高关节内压力。这两个病例分别涉及胫神经和腓总神经,它们都通过各自起源的关节分支很好地延伸到远离 STFJ 的位置(即臀部),这突出了机械原理的普遍性。这些广泛的神经内囊肿可以通过断开受影响的关节分支和切除起源关节来成功治疗,而不是通过更具侵袭性的手术切除囊肿和囊肿壁来治疗。