Who is afraid of reviewers' comments? Or, why anything can be published and anything can be cited.

Suppr

超能文献

作者信息

Ioannidis John P A, Tatsioni Athina, Karassa Fotini B

出版信息

Eur J Clin Invest. 2010 Apr;40(4):285-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2010.02272.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2362.2010.02272.x

PMID:20486989

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Who is afraid of reviewers' comments? Or, why anything can be published and anything can be cited.

Eur J Clin Invest. 2010 Apr;40(4):285-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2010.02272.x.

Innovation, journal reviewers, and journal editors the game is worth the candle.创新、期刊审稿人和期刊编辑——这是值得为之付出努力的。（原英文句子表述有些奇怪，推测可能想表达的是围绕创新、期刊审稿人和期刊编辑相关的事情是值得的，按此理解进行了翻译）

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Oct 4;46(7):1360-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.001.

Bad peer reviewers.糟糕的同行评审员。

Nature. 2001 Sep 13;413(6852):93. doi: 10.1038/35093213.

Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.期刊：如何判断哪些内容值得发表。

Nature. 2003 Jan 16;421(6920):209-10. doi: 10.1038/421209b.

Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.期刊要接受同行评审过程的审查。

Nature. 2006 Jan 19;439(7074):252. doi: 10.1038/439252b.

CONSORT and beyond.《CONSORT 声明及其他》

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Aug;132(2):229-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.03.040.

Three cheers for peers.为同龄人欢呼三声。

Nature. 2006 Jan 12;439(7073):118. doi: 10.1038/439118a.

The politics of publication.出版的政治学

Nature. 2003 Mar 20;422(6929):259-61. doi: 10.1038/422259a.

Help yourself by helping us: responding to reviewers' comments.

Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012 Jun;36(3):203-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00864.x.

Reviewers' reports should in turn be peer reviewed.审稿人的报告反过来也应该接受同行评审。

Nature. 2006 Jul 6;442(7098):26. doi: 10.1038/442026a.

引用本文的文献

Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature.比较生物医学文献中预印本和同行评审文章的报告质量。

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2020 Dec 1;5(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41073-020-00101-3.

Selecting your editorial board: maintaining standards.挑选您的编辑委员会：维持标准。

J Korean Med Sci. 2013 Jul;28(7):972-3. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.7.972.

Designing next-generation platforms for evaluating scientific output: what scientists can learn from the social web.设计下一代评价科研产出的平台：科学家可以从社交网络中学到什么。

Front Comput Neurosci. 2012 Oct 1;6:72. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00072. eCollection 2012.

Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals.生物医学期刊中最佳同行评审员与同行评审质量

Croat Med J. 2012 Aug;53(4):386-9. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.386.

Establishing a new journal for systematic review products.为系统评价产品创办一份新期刊。

Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 9;1:1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-1.

Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network.透明准确的报告可提高研究的可靠性、实用性和影响力：报告指南和 EQUATOR 网络。

BMC Med. 2010 Apr 26;8:24. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验