Suppr超能文献

家庭为基础的初级保健方案实施前后的住院和熟练护理机构入院情况。

Hospitalizations and skilled nursing facility admissions before and after the implementation of a home-based primary care program.

机构信息

Mount Sinai Visiting Doctors Program, Department of General Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jun;58(6):1144-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02859.x. Epub 2010 May 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of an urban house calls program (HCP) on healthcare utilization.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review with pre/post analysis.

SETTING

Urban home-based primary care program.

PARTICIPANTS

All participants (N=179) in a capitated insurance program enrolled in a HCP between October 2004 and August 2006.

INTERVENTION

Enrollment into HCP.

MEASUREMENTS

Hospitalizations and skilled nursing facility (SNF) admissions before and after enrollment. Patients with at least one hospitalization or SNF admission before and after enrollment were compared using the McNemar test. Median number of hospitalizations and SNF placements before and after HCP enrollment were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test.

RESULTS

Sixty-one percent of patients had one or more hospitalizations before enrollment, whereas only 38% had one or more hospitalizations after enrollment (P<.001). Thirty-eight percent of patients had at least one SNF placement before enrollment, compared with 18% after enrollment (P=.001). The median hospitalization rate decreased from 1 to 0; the median SNF placement rate was 0 (interquartile range 0-1) before enrollment and 0 (interquartile range 0-0) after enrollment (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

A HCP may be associated with fewer hospitalizations and SNF placements. Models of care that reduce morbidity and preserve quality of life are critical to help homebound older adults remain in their communities.

摘要

目的

评估城市上门医疗服务项目(HCP)对医疗保健利用的影响。

设计

回顾性图表审查与前后分析。

地点

基于家庭的城市初级保健计划。

参与者

2004 年 10 月至 2006 年 8 月间参与了一项人头保险计划并注册了 HCP 的所有参与者(N=179)。

干预措施

注册 HCP。

测量

入组前后的住院和熟练护理机构(SNF)入院情况。使用 McNemar 检验比较入组前后至少有一次住院或 SNF 入院的患者。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩和检验比较 HCP 入组前后的住院和 SNF 安置中位数。

结果

61%的患者在入组前有一次或多次住院,而只有 38%在入组后有一次或多次住院(P<.001)。38%的患者在入组前至少有一次 SNF 安置,而入组后为 18%(P=.001)。住院率中位数从 1 降至 0;SNF 安置率中位数为 0(四分位距 0-1),入组前为 0(四分位距 0-0),入组后为 0(P<.001)。

结论

HCP 可能与减少住院和 SNF 安置有关。减少发病率和维持生活质量的护理模式对于帮助居家的老年患者留在社区中至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验