Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health UCL Medical School, London, UK.
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 13;8(11):e024876. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024876.
In western countries, early visiting services (EVS) have been proposed as a recent intervention to reduce both general practitioner workload and hospital admissions among housebound individuals experiencing a healthcare need within the community. EVS involves the delegation of the patient home visits to other staff groups such as paramedics or nursing staff. However, the principles of organising this care are unknown and it remains unclear how different contexts, such as patient conditions and the processes of organising EVS influence care outcomes. A review has been designed to understand how EVS are enacted and, specifically, who benefits, why, how and when in order to provide further insight into the design and delivery of EVS.
The purpose of this review is to produce findings that provide explanations of how and why EVS contexts influence their associated outcomes. Evidence on EVS will be consolidated through realist review-a theory-driven approach to evidence synthesis. A realist approach is needed as EVS is a complex intervention. What EVS achieve is likely to vary for different individuals and contexts. We expect to synthesise a range of relevant data such as qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method research in the following stages: devising an initial programme theory, searching evidence, selecting appropriate documents, extracting data, synthesising and refining the programme theory.
A formal ethics review is not required as this study is secondary research. Findings will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal, at national and international conferences and to relevant professional associations.
CRD42018096518.
在西方国家,早期探访服务(EVS)作为一种新的干预措施被提出,旨在减轻全科医生的工作量,并减少因在社区中需要医疗护理而无法出门的患者的住院人数。EVS 涉及将患者的家访委托给其他工作人员群体,如护理人员或护士。然而,组织这种护理的原则尚不清楚,也不清楚不同的情况,如患者的病情和组织 EVS 的过程如何影响护理结果。本综述旨在了解 EVS 是如何实施的,特别是了解谁受益、为什么受益、如何受益以及何时受益,以便进一步了解 EVS 的设计和实施。
本综述的目的是提供有关 EVS 背景如何影响其相关结果的解释。将通过真实主义综述——一种基于理论的证据综合方法来整合 EVS 证据。之所以需要采用真实主义方法,是因为 EVS 是一种复杂的干预措施。EVS 对不同的个体和背景可能会产生不同的效果。我们预计将在以下阶段综合一系列相关数据,如定性、定量和混合方法研究:制定初始方案理论、搜索证据、选择适当的文件、提取数据、综合和完善方案理论。
由于本研究是二次研究,因此不需要进行正式的伦理审查。研究结果将在同行评议的期刊、国家和国际会议以及相关专业协会上发表。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42018096518。