Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
J Prof Nurs. 2010 May-Jun;26(3):188-95. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2010.01.003.
This descriptive study evaluated the implementation of a revised admission policy for the Indiana University School of Nursing baccalaureate program. On the basis of our decision that grade point average (GPA) alone should not determine admission, new admission criteria were developed and implemented in spring 2007. In addition to a weighted GPA, criteria were added to include an interview, a writing sample, and a service requirement. Following the completion of all interviews and prior to notification of applicants of their admission status, students and interviewers who participated in the first admission cycle were mailed a survey asking their anonymous perceptions regarding the new process for application to the program. Responses indicate that both interviewers (n = 45) and students (n = 165) thought that the new policy and the interview were extremely positive. Results suggest that this comprehensive and varied approach to student admission was successful in its initial implementation. Further longitudinal studies are needed to determine how the new criteria affect student diversity; examination and course grades; progression, retention, and graduation; Assessment Technologies Institute tests; National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses (NCLEX-RN) scores; admission to graduate school; and satisfaction of faculty with students and future employers with graduates.
本描述性研究评估了印第安纳大学护理学院学士学位课程修订后的入学政策的实施情况。基于我们认为仅凭平均绩点(GPA)不应决定入学的决定,我们制定并于 2007 年春季实施了新的入学标准。除了加权 GPA 外,还增加了包括面试、写作样本和服务要求等标准。在完成所有面试并在通知申请人入学状态之前,参与第一个招生周期的学生和面试官收到了一份调查,询问他们对该计划申请新流程的匿名看法。调查结果表明,面试官(n=45)和学生(n=165)都认为新政策和面试非常积极。结果表明,这种全面而多样的学生招生方法在最初实施时取得了成功。需要进一步的纵向研究来确定新标准如何影响学生的多样性;考试和课程成绩;进步、保留和毕业;评估技术学院测试;美国护士执照考试(NCLEX-RN)成绩;研究生入学;以及教师对学生和未来雇主对毕业生的满意度。