Lewin Adam B, Chang Susanna, McCracken James, McQueen Melissa, Piacentini John
University of South Florida College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Rothman Center for Pediatric Neuropsychiatry, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA.
Psychiatry Res. 2010 Jul 30;178(2):317-22. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.11.013. Epub 2010 May 21.
The comorbidity of tic disorders (TD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has long been recognized in the clinical literature and appears to be bidirectional, affecting 20-60% of individuals with each disorder. Coffey et al. (1998) found that adults with TD+OCD had a more severe comorbidity profile than adults with OCD or TD alone. This exploratory study in children attempts to evaluate whether heightened diagnostic severity, increased comorbidity load, and lower functioning is more commonplace in youth with TD+OCD in comparison to either syndrome alone. Participants were 306 children (seeking clinical evaluation) with TD, OCD, or TD+OCD. Assessment consisted of a diagnostic battery (including structured diagnostic interviews and standardized parent-report inventories) to evaluate diagnostic severity, comorbid psychopathology, behavioral and emotional correlates, and general psychosocial functioning. Data from this study sample were not supportive of the premise that youth with both a tic disorder and OCD present with elevated diagnostic severity, higher risk-for or intensity-of comorbidity, increased likelihood of externalizing/internalizing symptomatology, or lower broad-based adaptive functioning. The OCD group had elevated rates of comorbid anxiety disorders and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) were more prevalent among youth in the TD group. The three groups also differed on key demographic variables. Our findings suggest that, in contrast to adults, TD+OCD in children and adolescents does not represent a more severe condition than either disorder alone on the basis of diagnostic comorbidity, symptom severity, or functional impairment.
抽动障碍(TD)与强迫症(OCD)的共病现象在临床文献中早已得到认可,而且似乎是双向的,在患有这两种疾病的个体中,有20% - 60%的人受到影响。科菲等人(1998年)发现,患有TD + OCD的成年人共病情况比单独患有OCD或TD的成年人更为严重。这项针对儿童的探索性研究试图评估,与单独患有这两种综合征之一的青少年相比,诊断严重程度更高、共病负担增加以及功能较低的情况在患有TD + OCD的青少年中是否更为常见。研究参与者为306名患有TD、OCD或TD + OCD的儿童(寻求临床评估)。评估包括一套诊断工具(包括结构化诊断访谈和标准化的家长报告量表),以评估诊断严重程度、共病精神病理学、行为和情绪相关性以及一般心理社会功能。该研究样本的数据并不支持这样的前提,即同时患有抽动障碍和强迫症的青少年存在更高的诊断严重程度、更高的共病风险或强度、外化/内化症状的可能性增加,或者广泛的适应性功能较低。OCD组共病焦虑症的发生率较高,而注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和对立违抗障碍(ODD)在TD组的青少年中更为普遍。三组在关键人口统计学变量上也存在差异。我们的研究结果表明,与成年人不同,基于诊断共病、症状严重程度或功能损害,儿童和青少年中的TD + OCD并不比单独的任何一种疾病更为严重。