• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从肿瘤控制概率(TCP)和正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)角度看,前列腺癌切缘缩小及治疗技术的放射生物学影响。

Radiobiological impact of reduced margins and treatment technique for prostate cancer in terms of tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).

作者信息

Jensen Ingelise, Carl Jesper, Lund Bente, Larsen Erik H, Nielsen Jane

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics, Aalborg Hospital, University of Aarhus, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Med Dosim. 2011 Summer;36(2):130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2010.02.004. Epub 2010 May 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.meddos.2010.02.004
PMID:20488692
Abstract

Dose escalation in prostate radiotherapy is limited by normal tissue toxicities. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of margin size on tumor control and side effects for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) treatment plans with increased dose. Eighteen patients with localized prostate cancer were enrolled. 3DCRT and IMRT plans were compared for a variety of margin sizes. A marker detectable on daily portal images was presupposed for narrow margins. Prescribed dose was 82 Gy within 41 fractions to the prostate clinical target volume (CTV). Tumor control probability (TCP) calculations based on the Poisson model including the linear quadratic approach were performed. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) was calculated for bladder, rectum and femoral heads according to the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman method. All plan types presented essentially identical TCP values and very low NTCP for bladder and femoral heads. Mean doses for these critical structures reached a minimum for IMRT with reduced margins. Two endpoints for rectal complications were analyzed. A marked decrease in NTCP for IMRT plans with narrow margins was seen for mild RTOG grade 2/3 as well as for proctitis/necrosis/stenosis/fistula, for which NTCP <7% was obtained. For equivalent TCP values, sparing of normal tissue was demonstrated with the narrow margin approach. The effect was more pronounced for IMRT than 3DCRT, with respect to NTCP for mild, as well as severe, rectal complications.

摘要

前列腺放疗中的剂量递增受到正常组织毒性的限制。本研究的目的是评估在增加剂量的调强放射治疗(IMRT)和三维适形放射治疗(3DCRT)治疗计划中,边界大小对肿瘤控制和副作用的影响。纳入了18例局限性前列腺癌患者。比较了不同边界大小的3DCRT和IMRT计划。对于窄边界,预先设定了在每日射野图像上可检测到的标记物。前列腺临床靶区(CTV)的处方剂量为41次分割内82 Gy。基于包括线性二次模型的泊松模型进行肿瘤控制概率(TCP)计算。根据Lyman-Kutcher-Burman方法计算膀胱、直肠和股骨头的正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)。所有计划类型的TCP值基本相同,膀胱和股骨头的NTCP非常低。对于这些关键结构,IMRT且边界减小的情况下平均剂量达到最小值。分析了直肠并发症的两个终点。对于轻度RTOG 2/3级以及直肠炎/坏死/狭窄/瘘,边界窄的IMRT计划的NTCP显著降低,NTCP <7%。对于等效的TCP值,窄边界方法显示出对正常组织的保护作用。就轻度和重度直肠并发症的NTCP而言,IMRT的效果比3DCRT更明显。

相似文献

1
Radiobiological impact of reduced margins and treatment technique for prostate cancer in terms of tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).从肿瘤控制概率(TCP)和正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)角度看,前列腺癌切缘缩小及治疗技术的放射生物学影响。
Med Dosim. 2011 Summer;36(2):130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2010.02.004. Epub 2010 May 21.
2
Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate.调强放射治疗与三维适形放射治疗在前列腺癌治疗中的剂量学及放射生物学模型比较
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 May 1;59(1):267-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.01.024.
3
Rectal dose reduction with IMRT for prostate radiotherapy.调强适形放疗用于前列腺癌放疗时直肠剂量的降低
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2010 Jun;54(3):235-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02164.x.
4
The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.利用空间剂量梯度和概率密度函数评估前列腺调强放疗治疗计划中内部器官运动的影响。
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Mar 7;52(5):1469-84. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/5/016. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
5
The comparison of radiotherapy techniques for treatment of the prostate cancer: the three-field vs. the four-field.前列腺癌治疗中放射治疗技术的比较:三野照射与四野照射。
Neoplasma. 2004;51(1):64-9.
6
Dosimetric and radiobiologic comparison of 3D conformal versus intensity modulated planning techniques for prostate bed radiotherapy.前列腺床放射治疗中三维适形与调强放疗计划技术的剂量学和放射生物学比较
Med Dosim. 2009 Fall;34(3):256-60. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
7
Normal tissue complication probability: does simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy score over other techniques in treatment of prostate adenocarcinoma.正常组织并发症概率:在前列腺腺癌治疗中,同步整合加量调强放射治疗是否比其他技术更具优势。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2009 Apr-Jun;5(2):78-84. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.52789.
8
A new approach to computing normal tissue complication probability of an intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment with stereotactic radiotherapy boost of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a case study.一种计算鼻咽癌调强放疗联合立体定向放疗增敏时正常组织并发症概率的新方法:病例研究
Med Dosim. 2011 Summer;36(2):138-44. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2010.02.005. Epub 2010 May 26.
9
Inverse and forward optimization of one- and two-dimensional intensity-modulated radiation therapy-based treatment of concave-shaped planning target volumes: the case of prostate cancer.基于一维和二维调强放射治疗的凹形计划靶区治疗的逆向和正向优化:以前列腺癌为例
Radiother Oncol. 2003 Feb;66(2):185-95. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(02)00375-4.
10
Intensity modulated radiation therapy versus three dimensional conformal radiation therapy for treatment of high grade glioma: a radiobiological modeling study.调强放疗与三维适形放疗治疗高级别脑胶质瘤的放射生物学研究。
J Xray Sci Technol. 2010;18(4):393-402. doi: 10.3233/XST-2010-0270.

引用本文的文献

1
Dosimetric and Radiobiological Comparison of Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy and Helical Tomotherapy in Whole Pelvic Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer Patients.前列腺癌患者全盆腔放疗中三维适形放疗与螺旋断层放疗的剂量学和放射生物学比较
J Biomed Phys Eng. 2025 Aug 1;15(4):333-340. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2301-1587. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
A Ten-year-long Update on Radiation Proctitis Among Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Curative External Beam Radiotherapy.根治性外照射放疗治疗前列腺癌患者放射性直肠炎的十年更新。
In Vivo. 2021 May-Jun;35(3):1379-1391. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12390. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
3
Calculation of delivered composite dose from Calypso tracking data for prostate cancer: And subsequent evaluation of reasonable treatment interruption tolerance limits.
从前列腺癌 Calypso 跟踪数据计算递送的复合剂量:以及随后对合理治疗中断耐受极限的评估。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Aug;20(8):105-113. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12684. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
4
Comparison of Radiobiological Models for Radiation Therapy Plans of Prostate Cancer: Three-dimensional Conformal versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.前列腺癌放射治疗计划的放射生物学模型比较:三维适形放疗与调强放射治疗
J Biomed Phys Eng. 2019 Jun 1;9(3):267-278. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v9i3Jun.655. eCollection 2019 Jun.
5
A dosimetric phantom study of thoracic radiotherapy based on three-dimensional modeling of mediastinal lymph nodes.基于纵隔淋巴结三维建模的胸部放射治疗剂量学体模研究
Oncol Lett. 2018 Apr;15(4):5634-5642. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8084. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
6
Image-guided radiotherapy of the prostate using daily CBCT: the feasibility and likely benefit of implementing a margin reduction.使用每日锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)对前列腺进行图像引导放射治疗:实施缩小边界的可行性及可能的益处。
Br J Radiol. 2014 Dec;87(1044):20140459. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140459. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
7
Voxel-based population analysis for correlating local dose and rectal toxicity in prostate cancer radiotherapy.基于体素的前列腺癌放射治疗中局部剂量与直肠毒性相关的群体分析。
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Apr 21;58(8):2581-95. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/8/2581. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
8
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.容积旋转调强弧形治疗与常规调强适形放疗在食管癌中的比较:一项治疗计划的比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct 7;18(37):5266-75. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i37.5266.