Suppr超能文献

1,3-β-D-葡聚糖作为血液恶性肿瘤患者侵袭性真菌感染早期诊断的筛选试验存在困难——假阳性率高及其分析。

Difficulties in using 1,3-{beta}-D-glucan as the screening test for the early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections in patients with haematological malignancies--high frequency of false-positive results and their analysis.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine Hemato-Oncology, Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.

Department of Microbiology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.

出版信息

J Med Microbiol. 2010 Sep;59(Pt 9):1016-1022. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.019299-0. Epub 2010 May 20.

Abstract

We have evaluated the contribution of the 1,3-beta-d-glucan (BG) assay for the screening of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in patients with haematological malignancies. Serum samples from patients at risk of IFI were collected twice a week and retrospectively tested using the BG assay. BG screening was performed on 1143 samples from 91 patients during 104 anticancer treatment cycles. Proven and probable cases of IFI occurred in 9 (8.7 %) treatment cycles. Depending on the criterion of positivity used (1x >60 pg ml(-1), 1x >80 pg ml(-1), 2x >60 pg ml(-1) or 2x >80 pg ml(-1)) the sensitivity and specificity were 89, 89, 67 and 44 %, and 20, 48, 33 and 56 %, respectively. Although the test was marked as positive in 82, 68, 54 and 45 % of all the treatment cycles, in the majority of cases, these positivities were probably false. The major limit of the BG test was an extremely low positive predictive value (10 to 12 %). We have analysed mucositis, candida colonization, bacteraemia, use of antimicrobials, erythrocyte and thrombocyte filtered blood products, collecting tubes or sampling via venous catheters. Even though no factor is a major source of BG, it could at least partially influence BG assay performance. Thus, BG detection has a limited usefulness as a screening method for IFIs in patients with haematological malignancies.

摘要

我们评估了 1,3-β-d-葡聚糖(BG)检测在血液恶性肿瘤患者侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)筛查中的作用。每周两次采集有IFI 风险的患者的血清样本,并使用 BG 检测进行回顾性检测。在 104 个抗肿瘤治疗周期中,对 91 名患者的 1143 个样本进行了 BG 筛查。在 9 个(8.7%)治疗周期中出现了确诊和疑似 IFI 病例。根据所用阳性标准(1x>60pg/ml(-1)、1x>80pg/ml(-1)、2x>60pg/ml(-1)或 2x>80pg/ml(-1)),敏感性和特异性分别为 89%、89%、67%和 44%,以及 20%、48%、33%和 56%。尽管该检测在所有治疗周期中 82%、68%、54%和 45%被标记为阳性,但在大多数情况下,这些阳性结果可能是假阳性。BG 检测的主要限制是阳性预测值极低(10%至 12%)。我们分析了黏膜炎、念珠菌定植、菌血症、使用抗菌药物、红细胞和血小板过滤的血液制品、收集管或通过静脉导管采样。尽管没有一个因素是 BG 的主要来源,但它至少可以部分影响 BG 检测的性能。因此,BG 检测作为血液恶性肿瘤患者 IFI 的筛查方法,其用途有限。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验