Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, 200, Dongduk-Ro, Junggu, Daegu, 700-721, Korea.
Surg Endosc. 2010 Dec;24(12):3195-200. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1114-y. Epub 2010 May 20.
Premalignant duodenal lesions such as adenomas are rare. Surgical resection has been the standard approach to the treatment of these lesions. Endoscopic resection of superficial premalignant or malignant lesions of the gastrointestinal tract is used with increasing frequency. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection of duodenal neoplasms.
Patients with nonampullary duodenal adenomas or duodenal adenocarcinomas without familial polyposis syndrome between August 2002 and February 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. Data including location and size, technique used for the endoscopic resection, complications, and follow-up evaluation of the lesions were reviewed.
The study enrolled 24 patients with duodenal neoplasms. Of these patients, 23 had duodenal adenomas and 1 had an adenocarcinoma confined to the mucosa. The mean age of the patients was 57 years (range, 40-82). In terms of location, 12 lesions (50%, 12/24) were found in the second portion of the duodenum, and 11 (45.8%, 11/24) were found in the first portion. Tubular adenomas were the most common type (17/24, 70.8%). There were four cases of the villotubular type and three of the villous type. Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) was performed for 19 patients, EMR with ligation (EMR-L) for 3 patients, and snare polypectomy for 2 patients. Complete resection was achieved for 87.5% (21/24) of the patients, and the recurrence rate was 8.3% (2/24). All the complications were intraprocedural bleeding (n = 7), with no occurrence of perforation or infection. During a median follow-up period of 6 months (range, 3-36 months), recurrence of the duodenal neoplasm was observed in two cases. There was no procedure-related mortality.
Endoscopic resection of duodenal neoplasms was safe and effective treatment. During the short-term follow-up evaluation, EMR showed outcomes and complications comparable with prior procedures, including adenocarcinomas confined to the mucosa.
十二指肠的癌前病变,如腺瘤,较为罕见。这些病变的标准治疗方法是手术切除。内镜下切除胃肠道的浅表性癌前或恶性病变的应用频率越来越高。本研究旨在评估内镜下切除十二指肠肿瘤的安全性和有效性。
回顾性分析 2002 年 8 月至 2009 年 2 月间患有非壶腹区十二指肠腺瘤或无家族性息肉病综合征的十二指肠腺癌的患者。分析的数据包括病变的位置和大小、内镜下切除使用的技术、并发症以及病变的随访评估。
本研究纳入了 24 例十二指肠肿瘤患者。其中 23 例为十二指肠腺瘤,1 例为局限于黏膜的腺癌。患者的平均年龄为 57 岁(范围,40-82 岁)。就病变位置而言,12 个病变(50%,12/24)位于十二指肠第二段,11 个病变(45.8%,11/24)位于十二指肠第一段。管状腺瘤是最常见的类型(17/24,70.8%)。其中绒毛管状腺瘤 4 例,绒毛状腺瘤 3 例。19 例行常规内镜黏膜切除术(EMR),3 例行 EMR 结扎术(EMR-L),2 例行圈套切除术。87.5%(21/24)的患者完全切除,复发率为 8.3%(2/24)。所有并发症均为术中出血(n=7),无穿孔或感染发生。在中位 6 个月(范围,3-36 个月)的随访期间,2 例患者观察到十二指肠肿瘤复发。无与治疗相关的死亡病例。
内镜下切除十二指肠肿瘤是一种安全有效的治疗方法。在短期随访评估中,EMR 的结果和并发症与之前的治疗方法(包括局限于黏膜的腺癌)相当。