Suppr超能文献

股骨应变分布是否与颈型和转子间型髋部骨折的发生一致?一项实验性有限元研究。

Does femoral strain distribution coincide with the occurrence of cervical versus trochanteric hip fractures? An experimental finite element study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Technology, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 5000, 90014, Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

Med Biol Eng Comput. 2010 Jul;48(7):711-7. doi: 10.1007/s11517-010-0622-1. Epub 2010 May 21.

Abstract

The objective of this experimental finite element (FE) study is to test the hypothesis that strain distributions coincide with the occurrence of cervical versus trochanteric hip fractures during loading conditions simulating a sideways fall, and that the cervical versus trochanteric principal strain ratio predicts different fracture patterns. Cadaver femora (female, 83 +/- 9 years) were CT scanned and mechanically tested simulating a fall. Thirteen cervical and 13 trochanteric fracture cases were selected for FE analysis. Principal strain distributions were analysed, and strain ratio epsilon(C)/epsilon(T) for strain patterns over the cervical and trochanteric regions was computed. The ratio epsilon(C)/epsilon(T) in the femora with cervical fractures (mean +/- SD 1.103 +/- 0.127) differed from that in trochanteric fractures (0.925 +/- 0.137) (p = 0.001). The significant difference in the strain ratio between fracture types remained after accounting for femoral neck and trochanteric BMD (p = 0.014), showing that it is independent of BMD. Area under the ROC curve was 0.858 in the discrimination of fracture types. The model predicted the experimental fracture type correctly in 22 of 26 cases. The cervical versus trochanteric region principal strain ratio differed significantly between femora with experimental cervical versus trochanteric fractures, and 85% agreement was achieved for the occurrence of hip fracture types using a simple FE model.

摘要

本实验有限元(FE)研究的目的是验证以下假设:在模拟侧方跌倒的加载条件下,应变分布与颈骨和转子部髋部骨折的发生一致,且颈骨与转子部主应变比可预测不同的骨折模式。对尸体股骨(女性,83±9 岁)进行 CT 扫描并进行机械测试以模拟跌倒。选择了 13 例颈骨骨折和 13 例转子部骨折病例进行 FE 分析。分析了主应变分布,并计算了颈骨和转子区域的应变比 ε(C)/ε(T)。颈骨骨折组的应变比 ε(C)/ε(T)(平均值±SD,1.103±0.127)与转子部骨折组不同(0.925±0.137)(p=0.001)。在考虑股骨颈和转子部 BMD 后,骨折类型之间的应变比仍存在显著差异(p=0.014),表明其与 BMD 无关。ROC 曲线下面积在区分骨折类型时为 0.858。该模型在 26 例病例中有 22 例正确预测了实验性骨折类型。实验性颈骨和转子部骨折的股骨颈骨与转子部主应变比存在显著差异,使用简单的 FE 模型可实现 85%的髋部骨折类型发生的一致性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验