Wildfeuer A, Räder K
Fakultät für Theoretische Medizin, Universität Ulm, Donau.
Arzneimittelforschung. 1991 Jan;41(1):70-3.
Stability of beta-Lactamase Inhibitors and beta-Lactam Antibiotics in Parenteral Formulations as Well as in Body Fluids and Tissue Homogenates/Comparative studies with sulbactam, clavulanic acid, ampicillin and amoxicillin. The beta-lactamase inhibitors and the beta-lactam antibiotics are markedly different in chemical stability. The comparative examination of 4 different infusion solutions at 4 degrees C, 25 degrees C and 37 degrees C gives the following sequence of decreasing stability: sulbactam (CAS 68373-14-8), ampicillin (CAS 69-53-4), amoxicillin (CAS 61336-70-7) and clavulanic acid (CAS 58001-44-8). It is particularly striking that the two beta-lactamase inhibitors, sulbactam and clavulanic acid, behave very differently. Sulbactam is also much more stable than clavulanic acid to incubation at 37 degrees C in body fluids or in tissue homogenates. The differences in the stability of the individual drugs should be born in mind during clinical use of combination formulations such as sulbactam/ampicillin (Unacid) and clavulanic acid/amoxicillin.
β-内酰胺酶抑制剂与β-内酰胺类抗生素在注射剂以及体液和组织匀浆中的稳定性/与舒巴坦、克拉维酸、氨苄西林和阿莫西林的对比研究。β-内酰胺酶抑制剂与β-内酰胺类抗生素在化学稳定性上有显著差异。在4℃、25℃和37℃对4种不同输液溶液进行的对比检测得出稳定性递减顺序如下:舒巴坦(CAS 68373-14-8)、氨苄西林(CAS 69-53-4)、阿莫西林(CAS 61336-70-7)和克拉维酸(CAS 58001-44-8)。特别值得注意的是,两种β-内酰胺酶抑制剂舒巴坦和克拉维酸的表现差异很大。在37℃于体液或组织匀浆中孵育时,舒巴坦也比克拉维酸稳定得多。在临床使用诸如舒巴坦/氨苄西林(优立新)和克拉维酸/阿莫西林等复方制剂时,应牢记各药物稳定性的差异。