Suppr超能文献

[β-内酰胺酶抑制剂与β-内酰胺类抗生素在注射剂配方以及体液和组织匀浆中的稳定性。舒巴坦、克拉维酸、氨苄西林和阿莫西林的比较]

[Stability of beta-lactamase inhibitors and beta-lactam antibiotics in parenteral formulations as well as in body fluids and tissue homogenates. Comparison of sulbactam, clavulanic acid, ampicillin and amoxicillin].

作者信息

Wildfeuer A, Räder K

机构信息

Fakultät für Theoretische Medizin, Universität Ulm, Donau.

出版信息

Arzneimittelforschung. 1991 Jan;41(1):70-3.

PMID:2049115
Abstract

Stability of beta-Lactamase Inhibitors and beta-Lactam Antibiotics in Parenteral Formulations as Well as in Body Fluids and Tissue Homogenates/Comparative studies with sulbactam, clavulanic acid, ampicillin and amoxicillin. The beta-lactamase inhibitors and the beta-lactam antibiotics are markedly different in chemical stability. The comparative examination of 4 different infusion solutions at 4 degrees C, 25 degrees C and 37 degrees C gives the following sequence of decreasing stability: sulbactam (CAS 68373-14-8), ampicillin (CAS 69-53-4), amoxicillin (CAS 61336-70-7) and clavulanic acid (CAS 58001-44-8). It is particularly striking that the two beta-lactamase inhibitors, sulbactam and clavulanic acid, behave very differently. Sulbactam is also much more stable than clavulanic acid to incubation at 37 degrees C in body fluids or in tissue homogenates. The differences in the stability of the individual drugs should be born in mind during clinical use of combination formulations such as sulbactam/ampicillin (Unacid) and clavulanic acid/amoxicillin.

摘要

β-内酰胺酶抑制剂与β-内酰胺类抗生素在注射剂以及体液和组织匀浆中的稳定性/与舒巴坦、克拉维酸、氨苄西林和阿莫西林的对比研究。β-内酰胺酶抑制剂与β-内酰胺类抗生素在化学稳定性上有显著差异。在4℃、25℃和37℃对4种不同输液溶液进行的对比检测得出稳定性递减顺序如下:舒巴坦(CAS 68373-14-8)、氨苄西林(CAS 69-53-4)、阿莫西林(CAS 61336-70-7)和克拉维酸(CAS 58001-44-8)。特别值得注意的是,两种β-内酰胺酶抑制剂舒巴坦和克拉维酸的表现差异很大。在37℃于体液或组织匀浆中孵育时,舒巴坦也比克拉维酸稳定得多。在临床使用诸如舒巴坦/氨苄西林(优立新)和克拉维酸/阿莫西林等复方制剂时,应牢记各药物稳定性的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验