Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
J Evol Biol. 2010 Aug;23(8):1597-604. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02025.x. Epub 2010 May 19.
Although recent models for the evolution of personality, using game theory and life-history theory, predict that individuals should differ consistently in their cooperative behaviour, consistent individual differences in cooperative behaviour have rarely been documented. In this study, we used a long-term data set on wild meerkats to quantify the repeatability of two types of cooperative care (babysitting and provisioning) within individuals and examined how repeatability varied across age, sex and status categories. Contributions to babysitting and provisioning were significantly repeatable and positively correlated within individuals, with provisioning more repeatable than babysitting. While repeatability of provisioning was relatively invariant across categories of individuals, repeatability of babysitting increased with age and was higher for subordinates than dominants. These results provide support for theoretical predictions that life-history trade-offs favour the evolution of consistent individual differences in cooperative behaviour and raise questions about why some individuals consistently help more than others across a suite of cooperative behaviours.
尽管最近使用博弈论和生活史理论来研究人格进化的模型预测,个体在合作行为上应该始终存在差异,但个体在合作行为上的一致性差异很少被记录下来。在这项研究中,我们使用了关于野生猫鼬的长期数据集,来量化个体内部两种类型的合作照顾(照顾幼崽和提供食物)的可重复性,并研究了可重复性如何在年龄、性别和地位类别中变化。个体内部的照顾幼崽和提供食物的贡献具有显著的可重复性和正相关性,并且提供食物比照顾幼崽更具有可重复性。虽然提供食物的可重复性在个体类别中相对不变,但照顾幼崽的可重复性随着年龄的增长而增加,并且下属比上级更高。这些结果为理论预测提供了支持,即生活史权衡有利于合作行为中一致的个体差异的进化,并提出了一些问题,即为什么在一系列合作行为中,有些个体始终比其他个体提供更多的帮助。