Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
Vet Parasitol. 2010 Aug 27;172(1-2):33-45. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.04.025. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
Although a quantitative real-time PCR assay (qPCR) assay for the detection of Theileria equi has been developed and evaluated, it is possible that additional, as yet undetected 18S rRNA gene sequence variants may exist. A qPCR assay targeting a different gene, used in conjunction with the T. equi 18S rRNA qPCR assay, could assist in the detection of all T. equi genotypes in field samples. A T. equi ema-1-specific qPCR (Ueti et al., 2003) was tested on 107 South African field samples, 90 of which tested positive for T. equi antibody using the immuno-fluorescent antibody test (IFAT). The qPCR assay performed poorly, as T. equi was detected in only 67 of the 90 IFAT-positive field samples at quantification cycle (C(q)) values ranging from 27 to 39.95. Furthermore, a high C(q) value of 36.18 was obtained from DNA extracted from a South African in vitro-cultured T. equi WL isolate [1.38% parasitized erythrocytes (PE)] when a low C(q) value (indicative of a high T. equi DNA concentration) was expected. Approximately 600 bp of the ema-1 gene from 38 South African samples were sequenced and BLASTN analysis confirmed all sequences to be merozoite surface protein genes, with an identity of 87.1-100% to previously published T. equi ema-1 gene sequences. Alignment of the sequences revealed extensive sequence variations in the target regions of the primers and probes (Ueti et al., 2003), explaining the poor performance of the qPCR assay. Based on these observations, we developed a new TaqMan minor-groove binder (MGB) probe-based qPCR assay, targeting a more conserved region of the ema-1 gene. This assay was shown to be efficient and specific, and the detection limit, defined as the concentration at which 95% of T. equi-positive samples are detected, was determined to be 1.4 x 10(-4)% PE. The two ema-1 assays were compared by testing 41 South African field samples in parallel. The results suggested that the new assay was more sensitive than the original assay, as T. equi was detected in more samples and at lower C(q) values when the new assay was used. Phylogenetic analyses of the 18S rRNA gene sequences and ema-1 amino acid sequences from the same samples showed inconsistencies between the clades, indicating that the T. equi 18S rRNA genetic groups previously identified in South Africa may not represent distinct T. equi lineages. It is possible that the different T. equi ema-1 genotypes could be related to antigenic variability and pathogenicity and may be associated with clinical differences in equine piroplasmosis cases, but this remains to be elucidated.
尽管已经开发和评估了一种用于检测马媾疫锥虫的定量实时 PCR 检测方法(qPCR),但可能存在其他尚未检测到的 18S rRNA 基因序列变体。针对不同基因的 qPCR 检测方法与马媾疫锥虫 18S rRNA qPCR 检测方法结合使用,可帮助检测田间样本中的所有马媾疫锥虫基因型。一种马媾疫 ema-1 特异性 qPCR(Ueti 等人,2003 年)已在 107 份南非田间样本上进行了测试,其中 90 份使用免疫荧光抗体检测(IFAT)检测到马媾疫抗体呈阳性。qPCR 检测方法的性能不佳,因为在 90 份 IFAT 阳性田间样本中,仅在定量循环(C(q))值为 27 至 39.95 的范围内检测到 67 份 T. equi。此外,从南非体外培养的 T. equi WL 分离株的 DNA 中获得了高 C(q)值 36.18,而预期的 C(q)值应该较低(表明 T. equi DNA 浓度较高)。从 38 个南非样本中对 ema-1 基因的约 600bp 进行了测序,BLASTN 分析证实所有序列均为裂殖子表面蛋白基因,与先前发表的 T. equi ema-1 基因序列的同一性为 87.1-100%。序列比对显示引物和探针的靶区域存在广泛的序列变异(Ueti 等人,2003 年),这解释了 qPCR 检测方法的性能不佳。基于这些观察结果,我们开发了一种新的 TaqMan 小沟结合物(MGB)探针 qPCR 检测方法,该方法针对 ema-1 基因的更保守区域。该检测方法被证明是高效和特异的,检测限(定义为 95%的 T. equi 阳性样本被检测到的浓度)被确定为 1.4 x 10(-4)%PE。通过平行测试 41 个南非田间样本对这两种 ema-1 检测方法进行了比较。结果表明,新的检测方法比原始检测方法更灵敏,因为当使用新的检测方法时,更多的样本和更低的 C(q)值检测到了 T. equi。对同一样本的 18S rRNA 基因序列和 ema-1 氨基酸序列进行系统发育分析显示,不同的枝系之间存在不一致,表明先前在南非确定的 T. equi 18S rRNA 遗传群可能不代表不同的 T. equi 谱系。不同的 T. equi ema-1 基因型可能与抗原变异性和致病性有关,并且可能与马媾疫病例的临床差异有关,但这仍有待阐明。