Department of Neurochemistry, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010 Jun 15;20(12):3683-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.04.092. Epub 2010 May 6.
Homology models of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) suggest that subtype specificity is due to non-conserved residues in the complementary subunit of the ligand-binding pocket. Cytisine and its derivatives generally show a strong preference for heteromeric alpha4beta2* nAChRs over the homomeric alpha7 subtype, and the structural modifications studied do not cause large changes in their nAChR subtype selectivity. In the present work we docked cytisine, N-methylcytisine, and several pyridone ring-substituted cytisinoids into the crystallographic structure of the Lymnaea stagnalis acetylcholine binding protein (AChBP) co-crystallized with nicotine (1UW6). The graphical analysis of the best poses showed that cytisinoids have weak interactions with the side chains of the non-conserved amino acids in the complementary subunit justifying the use of PDB 1UWB as a surrogate for nAChR. Furthermore, we found a high correlation (R(2)=0.96) between the experimental pIC(50) values at alpha4beta2* nAChR and docking energy (S) of the best cytisinoid poses within the AChBP. Due to the quality of the correlation we suggest that this equation might be used as a predictive model to propose new cytisine-derived nAChRs ligands. Our docking results also suggest that further structural modifications of these cytisinoids will not greatly alter their alpha4beta2*/alpha7 selectivity.
烟碱型乙酰胆碱受体(nAChRs)的同源模型表明,亚型特异性是由于配体结合口袋的互补亚基中的非保守残基引起的。烟碱及其衍生物通常表现出对异源α4β2* nAChRs 的强烈偏好,而研究中的结构修饰不会导致它们对 nAChR 亚型选择性的大幅改变。在本工作中,我们将烟碱、N-甲基烟碱和几种吡啶酮环取代的烟碱类似物对接入与尼古丁(1UW6)共结晶的田螺乙酰胆碱结合蛋白(AChBP)的晶体结构中。最佳构象的图形分析表明,烟碱类似物与互补亚基中非保守氨基酸的侧链具有较弱的相互作用,这证明了使用 PDB 1UWB 作为 nAChR 的替代物是合理的。此外,我们发现实验测定的烟碱类似物在α4β2* nAChR 上的 pIC50 值与在 AChBP 中最佳烟碱类似物构象的对接能量(S)之间存在高度相关性(R2=0.96)。由于相关性的质量,我们建议该方程可用于提出新的烟碱衍生的 nAChRs 配体的预测模型。我们的对接结果还表明,对这些烟碱类似物进行进一步的结构修饰不会大大改变它们对α4β2*/α7 的选择性。