Suppr超能文献

采用四种免疫化学方法测定孕妇、胎儿及新生儿在抗心律失常治疗前及治疗期间血液中的地高辛。

Determination of digoxin in the blood of pregnant women, fetuses and neonates before and during anti-arrhythmic therapy, using four immunochemical methods.

作者信息

Schlebusch H, von Mende S, Grünn U, Gembruch U, Bald R, Hansmann M

机构信息

Centre for Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Bonn.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1991 Jan;29(1):57-66. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1991.29.1.57.

Abstract

Four immunochemical methods for digoxin assay were used to analyse control samples, 33 amniotic fluid samples, 57 samples from digitalis-treated, non-pregnant women, 90 pregnancy serum samples, and 72 samples of fetal or neonatal serum with or without digoxin therapy. One hundred and five samples were also submitted to ultrafiltration before analysis. Three methods (RIA, TDX, AMERLITE) showed practically the same precision, while the precision of the DELFIA was markedly inferior. In the analysis of serum samples from digoxin-treated, non-pregnant women, RIA and TDX gave practically the same values, whereas AMERLITE and DELFIA gave significantly higher values. Pregnancy serum and fetal serum contain "digoxin-like immunoreactive factors", and the qualitative and quantitative effects of these interfering factors are different for each of the four methods. The greatest sensitivity to "digoxin-like immunoreactive factors" is shown by TDX and DELFIA, while the lowest interference by "digoxin-like immunoreactive factors" is found in the analysis of ultrafiltered samples, using the TDX method. The composition of the "digoxin-like immunoreactive factors" in pregnancy serum and in fetal serum is altered by digoxin therapy, and these changes have different effects on the various analytical methods. The concentration of "digoxin-like immunoreactive factors" in the serum of fetuses receiving digoxin is markedly lower than that of healthy fetuses. For the reliable monitoring of digoxin therapy in the maternal and fetal circulation, the blood samples must be submitted to ultrafiltration before analysis.

摘要

采用四种免疫化学方法测定地高辛,分析对照样本、33份羊水样本、57份接受洋地黄治疗的非孕妇样本、90份妊娠血清样本以及72份接受或未接受地高辛治疗的胎儿或新生儿血清样本。105份样本在分析前还进行了超滤处理。三种方法(放射免疫分析、荧光偏振免疫分析、AMERLITE)显示出几乎相同的精密度,而时间分辨荧光免疫分析的精密度明显较差。在分析接受地高辛治疗的非孕妇血清样本时,放射免疫分析和荧光偏振免疫分析得出的数值几乎相同,而AMERLITE和时间分辨荧光免疫分析得出的数值明显更高。妊娠血清和胎儿血清中含有“地高辛样免疫反应因子”,这四种方法中这些干扰因子的定性和定量影响各不相同。荧光偏振免疫分析和时间分辨荧光免疫分析对“地高辛样免疫反应因子”最为敏感,而使用荧光偏振免疫分析方法分析超滤样本时,“地高辛样免疫反应因子”的干扰最小。地高辛治疗会改变妊娠血清和胎儿血清中“地高辛样免疫反应因子”的组成,这些变化对各种分析方法有不同影响。接受地高辛治疗的胎儿血清中“地高辛样免疫反应因子”的浓度明显低于健康胎儿。为了可靠监测母体和胎儿循环中的地高辛治疗情况,血液样本在分析前必须进行超滤处理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验