Doheny Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Jun;36(6):1011-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.036.
To compare aqueous outflow and India ink inflow to evaluate clear corneal incisions (CCIs).
Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Two 25-gauge needles connected to a salt solution bag and to a digital manometer were inserted through the limbus of human donor corneas 120 degrees apart from each other. Three 2.75 mm wide incisions were created in a different third of each cornea as follows: single-plane 1.50 mm tunnel length, single-plane 3.00 mm tunnel length, and 2-step 3.00 mm tunnel length. The Seidel test was evaluated at 5 intraocular pressures (IOPs) in the physiologic range. A masked observer evaluated the recorded tests. With a preset 10 mm Hg IOP, India ink was applied to the incision site and a sudden IOP fluctuation induced. India ink influx was outlined and measured by planimetry.
With the 1.5 mm single-plain incisions, all 6 globes showed inflow and outflow. With the 3.0 mm single-plain incisions, all 6 globes showed inflow and 2 showed outflow by the Seidel test. With the 3.0 mm 2-step incisions, 2 globes showed inflow and 3 had positive Seidel test results. Area and length of inflow were statistically significantly greater with the 2 single-planed incisions than with the 2-step incisions.
This human ex vivo model showed that wound deformation produced during Seidel testing might not be an accurate way to predict the risk for bacterial invasion in the early postoperative period.
比较房水流出和印度墨水流入以评估透明角膜切口(CCI)。
美国马里兰州巴尔的摩威尔默眼科研究所。
将两根 25 号针头分别通过供体角膜的角膜缘以 120 度的间隔连接到盐溶液袋和数字压力计上。在每只角膜的不同三分之一处创建三个 2.75 毫米宽的切口,如下所示:单平面 1.50 毫米隧道长度,单平面 3.00 毫米隧道长度和 2 步 3.00 毫米隧道长度。在生理范围内的 5 个眼内压(IOP)下评估 Seidel 测试。由一名蒙面观察者评估记录的测试。在预设的 10mmHgIOP 下,将印度墨水施加到切口部位并引起突然的IOP 波动。通过平面测量法勾勒和测量印度墨水的流入量。
在 1.5 毫米单平面切口的所有 6 个眼球中,均显示有流入和流出。在 3.0 毫米单平面切口的所有 6 个眼球中,所有 6 个眼球均显示有流入,并且通过 Seidel 测试有 2 个显示有流出。在 3.0 毫米 2 步切口的 2 个眼球中,有 2 个显示有流入,3 个显示有阳性 Seidel 测试结果。流入的面积和长度在统计学上明显大于 2 个单平面切口。
这种人体离体模型表明,在 Seidel 测试中产生的伤口变形可能不是预测术后早期细菌入侵风险的准确方法。