Suppr超能文献

核问题:重新思考多物种动物群体中物种的重要性。

The nuclear question: rethinking species importance in multi-species animal groups.

机构信息

Post-graduate Program in Wildlife Biology & Conservation, Wildlife Conservation Society - India Program & National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, GKVK, Bellary Road, Bangalore 560 065, India.

出版信息

J Anim Ecol. 2010 Sep;79(5):948-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01707.x. Epub 2010 May 24.

Abstract
  1. Animals group for various benefits, and may form either simple single-species groups, or more complex multi-species associations. Multi-species groups are thought to provide anti-predator and foraging benefits to participant individuals. 2. Despite detailed studies on multi-species animal groups, the importance of species in group initiation and maintenance is still rated qualitatively as 'nuclear' (maintaining groups) or 'attendant' (species following nuclear species) based on species-specific traits. This overly simplifies and limits understanding of inherently complex associations, and is biologically unrealistic, because species roles in multi-species groups are: (i) likely to be context-specific and not simply a fixed species property, and (ii) much more variable than this dichotomy indicates. 3. We propose a new view of species importance (measured as number of inter-species associations), along a continuum from 'most nuclear' to 'least nuclear'. Using mixed-species bird flocks from a tropical rainforest in India as an example, we derive inter-species association measures from randomizations on bird species abundance data (which takes into account species 'availability') and data on 86 mixed-species flocks from two different flock types. Our results show that the number and average strength of inter-species associations covary positively, and we argue that species with many, strong associations are the most nuclear. 4. From our data, group size and foraging method are ecological and behavioural traits of species that best explain nuclearity in mixed-species bird flocks. Parallels have been observed in multi-species fish shoals, in which group size and foraging method, as well as diet, have been shown to correlate with nuclearity. Further, the context in which multi-species groups occur, in conjunction with species-specific traits, influences the role played by a species in a multi-species group, and this highlights the importance of extrinsic factors in shaping species importance. 5. Our view of nuclearity provides predictive power in examining species roles in a variety of situations (e.g. predicting leadership in differently composed communities), and can be applied to examine a broad range of ecological and evolutionary questions pertinent to multi-species groups in general.
摘要
  1. 动物群体为了各种利益而形成,它们可以形成简单的单一物种群体,也可以形成更复杂的多物种群体。多物种群体被认为为参与个体提供了抗捕食和觅食的好处。

  2. 尽管对多物种动物群体进行了详细的研究,但物种在群体形成和维持中的重要性仍然被定性为“核心”(维持群体)或“伴随”(跟随核心物种的物种),这是基于物种特有的特征。这种方法过于简化和限制了对固有复杂群体的理解,并且在生物学上是不现实的,因为物种在多物种群体中的作用是:(i)可能是特定于上下文的,而不仅仅是物种的固定属性,(ii)比这种二分法所表明的更为多变。

  3. 我们提出了一种新的物种重要性观点(用物种间的关联数量来衡量),沿着从“最核心”到“最不核心”的连续体。我们以印度热带雨林中的混合鸟类群为例,从鸟类物种丰度数据的随机化中得出物种间的关联度量(这考虑到了物种的“可获得性”),并从两种不同类型的鸟类群中获取了 86 个混合鸟类群的数据。我们的结果表明,物种间的关联数量和平均强度呈正相关,我们认为具有许多强关联的物种是最核心的。

  4. 根据我们的数据,群体大小和觅食方式是物种的生态和行为特征,它们最好地解释了混合鸟类群中物种的核心性。在多物种鱼类鱼群中也观察到了类似的情况,其中群体大小和觅食方式以及饮食已经被证明与核心性相关。此外,多物种群体出现的背景,结合物种特有的特征,影响了一个物种在多物种群体中所扮演的角色,这突出了外在因素在塑造物种重要性方面的重要性。

  5. 我们对核心性的看法在检查物种在各种情况下的角色方面具有预测能力(例如,预测在不同组成的社区中的领导地位),并且可以应用于检查与一般多物种群体相关的广泛的生态和进化问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验