• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

核问题:重新思考多物种动物群体中物种的重要性。

The nuclear question: rethinking species importance in multi-species animal groups.

机构信息

Post-graduate Program in Wildlife Biology & Conservation, Wildlife Conservation Society - India Program & National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, GKVK, Bellary Road, Bangalore 560 065, India.

出版信息

J Anim Ecol. 2010 Sep;79(5):948-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01707.x. Epub 2010 May 24.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01707.x
PMID:20497487
Abstract
  1. Animals group for various benefits, and may form either simple single-species groups, or more complex multi-species associations. Multi-species groups are thought to provide anti-predator and foraging benefits to participant individuals. 2. Despite detailed studies on multi-species animal groups, the importance of species in group initiation and maintenance is still rated qualitatively as 'nuclear' (maintaining groups) or 'attendant' (species following nuclear species) based on species-specific traits. This overly simplifies and limits understanding of inherently complex associations, and is biologically unrealistic, because species roles in multi-species groups are: (i) likely to be context-specific and not simply a fixed species property, and (ii) much more variable than this dichotomy indicates. 3. We propose a new view of species importance (measured as number of inter-species associations), along a continuum from 'most nuclear' to 'least nuclear'. Using mixed-species bird flocks from a tropical rainforest in India as an example, we derive inter-species association measures from randomizations on bird species abundance data (which takes into account species 'availability') and data on 86 mixed-species flocks from two different flock types. Our results show that the number and average strength of inter-species associations covary positively, and we argue that species with many, strong associations are the most nuclear. 4. From our data, group size and foraging method are ecological and behavioural traits of species that best explain nuclearity in mixed-species bird flocks. Parallels have been observed in multi-species fish shoals, in which group size and foraging method, as well as diet, have been shown to correlate with nuclearity. Further, the context in which multi-species groups occur, in conjunction with species-specific traits, influences the role played by a species in a multi-species group, and this highlights the importance of extrinsic factors in shaping species importance. 5. Our view of nuclearity provides predictive power in examining species roles in a variety of situations (e.g. predicting leadership in differently composed communities), and can be applied to examine a broad range of ecological and evolutionary questions pertinent to multi-species groups in general.
摘要
  1. 动物群体为了各种利益而形成,它们可以形成简单的单一物种群体,也可以形成更复杂的多物种群体。多物种群体被认为为参与个体提供了抗捕食和觅食的好处。

  2. 尽管对多物种动物群体进行了详细的研究,但物种在群体形成和维持中的重要性仍然被定性为“核心”(维持群体)或“伴随”(跟随核心物种的物种),这是基于物种特有的特征。这种方法过于简化和限制了对固有复杂群体的理解,并且在生物学上是不现实的,因为物种在多物种群体中的作用是:(i)可能是特定于上下文的,而不仅仅是物种的固定属性,(ii)比这种二分法所表明的更为多变。

  3. 我们提出了一种新的物种重要性观点(用物种间的关联数量来衡量),沿着从“最核心”到“最不核心”的连续体。我们以印度热带雨林中的混合鸟类群为例,从鸟类物种丰度数据的随机化中得出物种间的关联度量(这考虑到了物种的“可获得性”),并从两种不同类型的鸟类群中获取了 86 个混合鸟类群的数据。我们的结果表明,物种间的关联数量和平均强度呈正相关,我们认为具有许多强关联的物种是最核心的。

  4. 根据我们的数据,群体大小和觅食方式是物种的生态和行为特征,它们最好地解释了混合鸟类群中物种的核心性。在多物种鱼类鱼群中也观察到了类似的情况,其中群体大小和觅食方式以及饮食已经被证明与核心性相关。此外,多物种群体出现的背景,结合物种特有的特征,影响了一个物种在多物种群体中所扮演的角色,这突出了外在因素在塑造物种重要性方面的重要性。

  5. 我们对核心性的看法在检查物种在各种情况下的角色方面具有预测能力(例如,预测在不同组成的社区中的领导地位),并且可以应用于检查与一般多物种群体相关的广泛的生态和进化问题。

相似文献

1
The nuclear question: rethinking species importance in multi-species animal groups.核问题:重新思考多物种动物群体中物种的重要性。
J Anim Ecol. 2010 Sep;79(5):948-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01707.x. Epub 2010 May 24.
2
The social structure and strategies of delphinids: predictions based on an ecological framework.海豚的社会结构与策略:基于生态框架的预测
Adv Mar Biol. 2007;53:195-294. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2881(07)53003-8.
3
Spatiotemporal patterns and dynamics of species richness and abundance of woody plant functional groups in a tropical forest landscape of Hainan Island, South China.中国南部海南岛热带森林景观中木本植物功能群物种丰富度和多度的时空格局及动态
J Integr Plant Biol. 2008 May;50(5):547-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00663.x.
4
Why migrate? A test of the evolutionary precursor hypothesis.为何迁移?进化前驱假说的一项检验。
Am Nat. 2007 Mar;169(3):344-59. doi: 10.1086/511335. Epub 2007 Jan 18.
5
The response of avian feeding guilds to tropical forest disturbance.鸟类取食类群对热带森林干扰的响应。
Conserv Biol. 2007 Feb;21(1):133-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00557.x.
6
Bird community response to fruit energy.鸟类对果实能量的反应。
J Anim Ecol. 2010 Jul;79(4):824-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01699.x. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
7
[Modified-habitat use by tropical forest-dependent birds in the Caribbean region of Guatemala].[危地马拉加勒比地区依赖热带森林的鸟类对栖息地的改良利用]
Rev Biol Trop. 2009 Mar-Jun;57(1-2):401-19.
8
A classification scheme for mixed-species bird flocks.鸟类混合群的分类方案。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Jun 5;378(1878):20220100. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0100. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
9
Are mixed-species bird flocks stable through two decades?混合物种鸟群能稳定存在二十年吗?
Am Nat. 2013 Mar;181(3):E53-9. doi: 10.1086/669152. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
10
The latitudinal gradient in dispersal constraints: ecological specialisation drives diversification in tropical birds.扩散限制的纬度梯度:生态特化驱动热带鸟类的多样化。
Ecol Lett. 2012 Aug;15(8):847-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01806.x. Epub 2012 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisiting the 'nuclear species' concept: do we really know what we think we know?重新审视“核种”概念:我们真的了解自己认为了解的吗?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Jun 5;378(1878):20220108. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0108. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
2
A classification scheme for mixed-species bird flocks.鸟类混合群的分类方案。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Jun 5;378(1878):20220100. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0100. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
3
Mixed company: a framework for understanding the composition and organization of mixed-species animal groups.
混合群体:理解混合物种动物群体组成和组织的框架。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2020 Aug;95(4):889-910. doi: 10.1111/brv.12591. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
4
The influence of a single species on the space use of mixed-species flocks in Amazonian Peru.单一物种对秘鲁亚马逊地区混合物种鸟群空间利用的影响。
Mov Ecol. 2019 Nov 28;7:37. doi: 10.1186/s40462-019-0181-5. eCollection 2019.
5
Molecular phylogeny, ecology and multispecies aggregation behaviour of bombardier beetles in Arizona.亚利桑那州喷焰甲虫的分子系统发育、生态学和多物种聚集行为。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 31;13(10):e0205192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205192. eCollection 2018.
6
Transition between segregation and aggregation: the role of environmental constraints.从隔离到聚集的转变:环境约束的作用。
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 7;6:32703. doi: 10.1038/srep32703.
7
Sensitivity of density-dependent threshold to species composition in arthropod aggregates.密度依赖型阈值对节肢动物聚集物物种组成的敏感性。
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 31;6:32576. doi: 10.1038/srep32576.
8
Does mixed-species flocking influence how birds respond to a gradient of land-use intensity?混合物种集群会影响鸟类对土地利用强度梯度的反应方式吗?
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jul 22;282(1811). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1118.
9
Importance of intraspecifically gregarious species in a tropical bird community.热带鸟类群落中种内群居物种的重要性。
Oecologia. 2014 Nov;176(3):763-70. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-3045-0. Epub 2014 Sep 3.