Department of Medicine, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
J Thorac Imaging. 2011 Feb;26(1):48-53. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e3181d73a8f.
With advances in technology, detection of small pulmonary nodules is increasing. Nodule detection software (NDS) has been developed to assist radiologists with pulmonary nodule diagnosis. Although it may increase sensitivity for small nodules, often there is an accompanying increase in false-positive findings. We designed a study to examine the extent to which computed tomography (CT) NDS influences the confidence of radiologists in identifying small pulmonary nodules.
Eight radiologists (readers) with different levels of experience examined thoracic CT scans of 131 cases and identified all the clinically relevant pulmonary nodules. The reference standard was established by an expert, dedicated thoracic radiologist. For each nodule, the readers recorded nodule size, density, location, and confidence level. Two weeks (or more) later, the readers reinterpreted the same scans; however, this time they were provided marks, when present, as indicated by NDS and asked to reassess their level of confidence. The effect of NDS on changes in reader confidence was assessed using multivariable generalized linear regression models.
A total of 327 unique nodules were identified. Declines in confidence were significantly (P<0.05) associated with the absence of an NDS mark and smaller nodules (odds ratio=71.0, 95% confidence interval =14.8-339.7). Among nodules with pre-NDS confidence less than 100%, increases in confidence were significantly (P<0.05) associated with the presence of an NDS mark (odds ratio=6.0, 95% confidence interval =2.7-13.6) and larger nodules. Secondary findings showed that NDS did not improve reader diagnostic accuracy.
Although in this study NDS does not seem to enhance reader accuracy, the confidence of the radiologists in identifying small pulmonary nodules with CT is greatly influenced by NDS.
随着技术的进步,对小肺结节的检测越来越多。结节检测软件(NDS)的开发旨在协助放射科医生进行肺结节诊断。虽然它可能会提高对小结节的敏感性,但通常会伴随着假阳性结果的增加。我们设计了一项研究,以检查 CT 结节检测软件(NDS)在多大程度上影响放射科医生识别小肺结节的信心。
8 名不同经验水平的放射科医生(读者)检查了 131 例胸部 CT 扫描,并识别了所有临床相关的肺结节。参考标准由一名专家,即专门的胸部放射科医生建立。对于每个结节,读者记录了结节的大小、密度、位置和信心水平。两周(或更长时间)后,读者重新解读了相同的扫描;然而,这次他们提供了 NDS 标记,如果有标记,要求他们重新评估自己的信心水平。使用多变量广义线性回归模型评估 NDS 对读者信心变化的影响。
共识别出 327 个独特的结节。信心下降与无 NDS 标记和结节较小显著相关(优势比=71.0,95%置信区间=14.8-339.7)。在 NDS 信心低于 100%的结节中,信心增加与 NDS 标记的存在显著相关(优势比=6.0,95%置信区间=2.7-13.6)和结节较大。次要发现表明,NDS 并没有提高读者的诊断准确性。
尽管在这项研究中,NDS 似乎并没有提高读者的准确性,但 CT 对小肺结节的识别,放射科医生的信心受到 NDS 的极大影响。