Orthopaedic Department and Arthroscopic Centre, Hatanpää Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Scand J Surg. 2010;99(1):50-4. doi: 10.1177/145749691009900111.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid-term result of the arthroscopic subacromial decompression after failed conservative treatment of shoulder pain caused by subacromial impingement, when the patients were treated as an outpatient way or by staying overnight in hospital after surgery (hospitalized patients). Our hypothesis was that the results would be equal in both groups.
Arthroscopic subacromial decompression was performed in 80 consecutive patients, of which 40 patients were treated as an outpatient way (Outpatient Group), and 40 patients as a hospitalized way (Hospitalized Group). A prospective, comparative 2- to 5-year follow-up study including clinical examination, radiographic evaluation, isometric elevation strength measurements, as well as the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and Constant shoulder scores was performed in 74 patients (93%).
Preoperatively, the mean UCLA score was 19 (SD 3) in the Outpatient Group, and 19 (SD 3) in the Hospitalized Group. Respectively, the mean Constant scores were 62 (SD 10) and 60 (SD 11). At the follow-up, the mean UCLA score was 32 (SD 4) in the Outpatient Group, and 32 (SD 3) in the Hospitalized Group, which both indicated good clinical outcome. Respectively, the mean Constant scores were 95 (SD 7) and 92 (SD 11), which both indicated excellent clinical outcome. At the follow-up, the UCLA and the Constant shoulder scores were significantly bet-ter than preoperatively in both groups (p < 0.01, p < 0.01), although no differences were found between the groups.The duration of the sick leaves and ability to return to work were similar in both groups. Also, the isometric elevation strengths of the operated shoulders were equally good in both groups.
According to this study, the results of arthroscopic subacromial decompression were equally good whether the patient was treated as an outpatient way or by staying over-night in hospital after surgery. The results were significantly better at follow-up than preoperatively in both groups. Key words: Shoulder pain; subacromial impingement; arthroscopic subacromial decompression; outpatient unit; hospitalized patient; clinical result.
本研究旨在评估经保守治疗失败的肩峰下撞击症患者行关节镜下肩峰下减压术的中期疗效,这些患者分别采用门诊治疗(门诊组)和术后住院(住院组)的方式。我们的假设是两组的结果是相等的。
对 80 例连续患者进行了关节镜下肩峰下减压术,其中 40 例采用门诊治疗(门诊组),40 例采用住院治疗(住院组)。对 74 例(93%)患者进行了前瞻性、对照性的 2 至 5 年随访研究,包括临床检查、影像学评估、等长抬高力量测量以及加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)和Constant 肩部评分。
术前,门诊组的 UCLA 平均评分为 19(SD3),住院组为 19(SD3)。相应地,Constant 评分的平均值分别为 62(SD10)和 60(SD11)。在随访时,门诊组的 UCLA 平均评分为 32(SD4),住院组为 32(SD3),均表明临床疗效良好。相应地,Constant 评分的平均值分别为 95(SD7)和 92(SD11),均表明临床疗效优异。在随访时,两组的 UCLA 和 Constant 肩部评分均明显优于术前(p<0.01,p<0.01),但两组间无差异。两组的病假时间和恢复工作的能力相似。此外,两组术后肩部的等长抬高力量同样良好。
根据本研究,患者采用门诊治疗或术后住院治疗的方式,关节镜下肩峰下减压术的结果是相等的。两组的随访结果均明显优于术前。关键词:肩痛;肩峰下撞击症;关节镜下肩峰下减压术;门诊单元;住院患者;临床结果。