Suppr超能文献

血管紧张素受体阻滞剂和钙通道阻滞剂对动脉僵硬度的不同影响。

Differential impact of angiotensin receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers on arterial stiffness.

作者信息

Andreadis E A, Sfakianakis M E, Tsourous G I, Georgiopoulos D X, Fragouli E G, Katsanou P M, Tavoularis E I, Skarlatou M G, Marakomichelakis G E, Ifanti G K, Diamantopoulos E J

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Unit of Vascular Medicine, "Evangelismos" State General Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Int Angiol. 2010 Jun;29(3):266-72.

Abstract

AIM

Arterial stiffness, assessed by ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI), is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in hypertensives. However, it is unclear whether certain antihypertensive drugs are conducive to the reduction in CVD morbidity and mortality through their beneficial effect on arterial stiffness. Therefore, we compared the effect of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) on AASI in a hypertensive population.

METHODS

We studied 188 individuals with newly-diagnosed essential hypertension without organ damage or CVD. AASI was calculated from twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) readings at baseline and after twelve weeks of antihypertensive treatment. Therapy was initiated with a low-dose of CCB (group A) or ARB (group B). After six weeks, subjects with poor office blood pressure (BP) control were further randomized to high-dose monotherapy (CCB in group C or ARB in group D) or low-dose combination therapy (CCB plus ARB, group E).

RESULTS

Groups A and B showed similar reductions in systolic and diastolic BP (r=-0.12, P=0.92 and r=-0.07, P=0.58 in group A and r=-0.06, P=0.67 and r=-0.04, P=0.73 in group B, respectively). However, only subjects in group B achieved significant AASI decrease (P<0.001). Similarly, subjects in groups C, D and E also displayed a comparable BP reduction, but only those in group E attained significant AASI decrease (P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

ARB treatment, either as low-dose monotherapy or in combination with a CCB in hypertensives who do not achieve BP control with monotherapy, has a beneficial effect on arterial stiffness. As arterial stiffness is an important modifiable risk factor, our findings highlight the value of ARBs beyond their BP lowering properties.

摘要

目的

通过动态动脉僵硬度指数(AASI)评估的动脉僵硬度是高血压患者心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率的独立预测指标。然而,尚不清楚某些抗高血压药物是否通过对动脉僵硬度的有益作用有助于降低CVD发病率和死亡率。因此,我们比较了血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)和钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)对高血压人群AASI的影响。

方法

我们研究了188例新诊断的原发性高血压患者,这些患者无器官损害或CVD。AASI根据基线时以及抗高血压治疗12周后的24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)读数计算得出。治疗从低剂量CCB(A组)或ARB(B组)开始。六周后,诊室血压(BP)控制不佳的受试者被进一步随机分为高剂量单药治疗(C组用CCB或D组用ARB)或低剂量联合治疗(CCB加ARB,E组)。

结果

A组和B组的收缩压和舒张压下降幅度相似(A组r = -0.12,P = 0.92;r = -0.07,P = 0.58;B组r = -0.06,P = 0.67;r = -0.04,P = 0.73)。然而,只有B组的受试者AASI显著降低(P < 0.001)。同样,C组、D组和E组的受试者血压下降幅度相当,但只有E组的受试者AASI显著降低(P = 0.001)。

结论

ARB治疗,无论是低剂量单药治疗还是与CCB联合用于单药治疗未达血压控制的高血压患者,对动脉僵硬度均有有益作用。由于动脉僵硬度是一个重要的可改变危险因素,我们的研究结果突出了ARB除降压特性之外的价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验