• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜直肠癌切除术中能否获得足够的淋巴结清扫?200 例病例对照研究结果。

Can adequate lymphadenectomy be obtained by laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer? Results of a case-control study in 200 patients.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital, Grenoble cedex, France.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Aug;14(8):1244-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1228-5. Epub 2010 May 26.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-010-1228-5
PMID:20502976
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study is to compare pathological findings in rectal cancer specimens obtained by laparoscopy or laparotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bowel length, distal and circumferential margins, and number of total and positive nodes harvested were prospectively recorded in specimens obtained from 100 consecutive patients who had a laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for cancer. These data were compared with those extracted from a well-matched group of 100 patients who had an open procedure.

RESULTS

The mean length of the specimens was 31.04 cm in the case group and 29.45 cm in the control group (not significant (NS)). All distal margins in both groups were negative. The circumferential margin was positive in four cases in the case group and nine cases in the control group (NS). The mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 13.76 nodes/patient in the case group and 12.74 nodes/patient in the control group (NS). The mean number of involved lymph nodes was 1.18 node/case in the case group and 1.96 node/case in group 2 (NS).

CONCLUSION

There is no difference between laparoscopic or open approaches concerning specimen's length, distal margin, circumferential margin, and total and positive lymph nodes. Laparoscopic rectal resection is not only technically feasible but it seems also oncologically safe.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较腹腔镜和剖腹手术获取的直肠癌标本的病理发现。

材料和方法

前瞻性记录了 100 例连续接受腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗癌症的患者标本中的肠长度、远端和环周切缘以及总淋巴结和阳性淋巴结的数量,并与 100 例接受开放性手术的患者的匹配组进行了比较。

结果

病例组标本的平均长度为 31.04cm,对照组为 29.45cm(无显著性差异(NS))。两组的所有远端切缘均为阴性。病例组有 4 例环周切缘阳性,对照组有 9 例(NS)。病例组平均每例患者采集的淋巴结数为 13.76 个,对照组为 12.74 个(NS)。病例组平均受累淋巴结数为 1.18 个/例,对照组为 1.96 个/例(NS)。

结论

腹腔镜或剖腹手术在标本长度、远端切缘、环周切缘以及总淋巴结和阳性淋巴结方面没有差异。腹腔镜直肠切除术不仅在技术上可行,而且似乎在肿瘤学上也是安全的。

相似文献

1
Can adequate lymphadenectomy be obtained by laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer? Results of a case-control study in 200 patients.腹腔镜直肠癌切除术中能否获得足够的淋巴结清扫?200 例病例对照研究结果。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Aug;14(8):1244-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1228-5. Epub 2010 May 26.
2
Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better short-term outcomes than open surgery: a large single-center comparative study.腹腔镜直肠癌切除术比开放手术获得更高的淋巴结检出数和更好的短期疗效:一项大型单中心对比研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Jun;56(6):679-88. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318287c594.
3
[Transanal lateral lymph node dissection surgery for 5 cases of mid-low rectal cancer].5例中低位直肠癌经肛门侧方淋巴结清扫术
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 25;22(8):781-785. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.08.014.
4
Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced low rectal cancer.机器人辅助腹腔镜与开放外侧淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期低位直肠癌的肿瘤学结果。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4498-4505. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6197-x. Epub 2018 May 2.
5
Is laparoscopic surgery really effective for the treatment of colon and rectal cancer in very elderly over 80 years old? A prospective multicentric case-control assessment.腹腔镜手术对80岁以上超高龄患者的结直肠癌治疗真的有效吗?一项前瞻性多中心病例对照评估。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4372-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4755-7. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
6
Postoperative morbidity and mortality after mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for clinical stage II or stage III lower rectal cancer (JCOG0212): results from a multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial.中低位直肠癌行直肠系膜切除术联合或不联合侧方淋巴结清扫的术后发病率和死亡率(JCOG0212):来自一项多中心、随机对照、非劣效性试验的结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jun;13(6):616-21. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70158-4. Epub 2012 May 15.
7
Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is achievable and offers advantages as a minimally invasive surgery over the open approach.腹腔镜盆腔外侧淋巴结清扫术是可行的,作为一种微创手术,它比开放手术具有优势。
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1938-47. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4418-0. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
8
[Comparative study of 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal tumors].[三维与二维腹腔镜手术治疗胃肠道肿瘤的对比研究]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 May 25;20(5):509-513.
9
There is no difference in outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌的疗效无差异:短期和长期肿瘤学结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Aug;21(8):595-604. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1662-4. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
10
Fewer than 12 lymph nodes can be expected in a surgical specimen after high-dose chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer.在直肠癌接受高剂量放化疗后,手术标本中预计只能检测到不到 12 个淋巴结。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Jul;53(7):1023-9. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181dadeb4.

引用本文的文献

1
Prophylactic Ureteral Catheterization for Preventing Ureteral Injury in Colorectal Cancer Surgery.预防性输尿管插管预防结直肠癌手术中输尿管损伤
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 11;14(12):4123. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124123.
2
Laparoscopic Approach to Rectal Cancer-The New Standard?腹腔镜直肠癌手术——新标准?
Front Oncol. 2020 Jul 31;10:1239. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01239. eCollection 2020.
3
Comparison of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.三维腹腔镜与二维腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌的比较:荟萃分析。

本文引用的文献

1
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy does not necessarily reduce lymph node retrieval in rectal cancer specimens--results from a prospective evaluation with extensive pathological work-up.术前放化疗不一定会减少直肠癌标本中的淋巴结检出--一项广泛病理评估的前瞻性评估结果。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Jan;14(1):96-103. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1057-6. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
2
Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: oncological results and clinical outcome of 225 patients.腹腔镜直肠癌手术:225例患者的肿瘤学结果及临床结局
Surg Endosc. 2008 Oct;22(10):2229-37. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0028-4. Epub 2008 Jul 12.
3
Prognostic implications of the distribution of lymph node metastases in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Sep;34(9):1577-1583. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03353-8. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
4
Initial experience with a dual-console robotic-assisted platform for training in colorectal surgery.双控制台机器人辅助平台在结直肠外科手术培训中的初步经验。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Sep;21(9):721-727. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1687-8. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
5
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助手术治疗结直肠癌:一项荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5601-5614. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4892-z. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
6
Current status of laparoscopy for the treatment of rectal cancer.腹腔镜治疗直肠癌的现状
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 7;20(41):15125-34. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i41.15125.
7
Laparoscopic rectal resection versus open rectal resection with minilaparotomy for invasive rectal cancer.腹腔镜直肠切除术与小切口开腹直肠切除术治疗浸润性直肠癌的比较。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2014 Feb;5(1):36-45. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2013.052.
8
Equipoise of outcome is sufficient to justify the laparoscopic approach for colorectal cancers.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Jun;15(6):1072; author reply 1073. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1412-2. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
新辅助放化疗后直肠癌淋巴结转移分布的预后意义
J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 1;26(13):2106-11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.7704. Epub 2008 Mar 24.
4
Lymph nodes after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma: number, status, and impact on survival.直肠癌术前放化疗后的淋巴结:数量、状态及其对生存的影响。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2008 Jan;32(1):45-50. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3180dc92ab.
5
Evaluation of the technical difficulty performing laparoscopic resection of a rectosigmoid carcinoma: visceral fat reflects technical difficulty more accurately than body mass index.评估乙状结肠癌腹腔镜切除术的技术难度:内脏脂肪比体重指数更能准确反映技术难度。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Jun;21(6):929-34. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9084-9. Epub 2007 Feb 7.
6
A national study on lymph node retrieval in resectional surgery for colorectal cancer.一项关于结直肠癌切除手术中淋巴结清扫的全国性研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Nov;49(11):1673-83. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0691-2.
7
The importance of accurate pathological assessment of lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer.结直肠癌中淋巴结受累情况准确病理评估的重要性。
Colorectal Dis. 2006 Jul;8(6):460-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01044.x.
8
Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.结直肠癌患者传统手术与腹腔镜辅助手术的短期终点(MRC CLASICC试验):多中心随机对照试验
Lancet. 2005;365(9472):1718-26. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2.
9
Can pathological complete response in the primary tumour following pre-operative pelvic chemoradiotherapy for T3-T4 rectal cancer predict for sterilisation of pelvic lymph nodes, a low risk of local recurrence and the appropriateness of local excision?对于T3 - T4期直肠癌,术前盆腔放化疗后原发肿瘤的病理完全缓解能否预测盆腔淋巴结清除、局部复发低风险以及局部切除的适宜性?
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006 Jan;21(1):11-7. doi: 10.1007/s00384-005-0749-y. Epub 2005 Apr 30.
10
Influence of obesity on lymph node recovery from rectal resection specimens.肥胖对直肠切除标本淋巴结恢复的影响。
Pathol Oncol Res. 2003;9(3):180-3. doi: 10.1007/BF03033734. Epub 2003 Oct 7.