• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助腹腔镜与开放外侧淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期低位直肠癌的肿瘤学结果。

Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced low rectal cancer.

机构信息

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4498-4505. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6197-x. Epub 2018 May 2.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-018-6197-x
PMID:29721748
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection (RALLD) have not been fully investigated. This study aimed to assess the oncological and long-term outcomes of RALLD for rectal cancer through comparison with those of open lateral lymph node dissection (OLLD) in a retrospective study.

METHODS

Between September 2002 and October 2014, the medical data of 426 patients who underwent total mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection for primary rectal cancer were collected. Of these, 115 patients were excluded after data collection (stage IV, n = 61; total pelvic exenteration, n = 31; multiple cancer, n = 20; conventional laparoscopic surgery, n = 3). Before matching, 311 patients with clinical stage II/III were analyzed. Using exact matching, patients were stratified into RALLD (n = 78) and OLLD (n = 78) groups. Pathological findings and long-term outcomes were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The pathological stage and number of harvested lymph nodes showed no significant differences between the groups. The rate of positive resection margin in the RALLD group tended to be lower compared with that of the OLLD group (p = 0.059). The median follow-up duration was 54.0 months in 156 patients. The 5-year overall survival rate was 95.4 and 87.8% in the RALLD and OLLD groups, respectively (p = 0.106). The 5-year relapse-free survival rate was 79.1 and 69.9% in the RALLD and OLLD groups, respectively (p = 0.157). The 5-year local relapse-free survival rate was 98.6 and 90.9% in the RALLD and OLLD groups, respectively (p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

The short- and long-term outcomes indicated that RALLD may be a useful modality for locally advanced low rectal cancer.

摘要

背景

机器人辅助腹腔镜侧方淋巴结清扫术(RALLD)的长期结果尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在通过与开放式侧方淋巴结清扫术(OLLD)的比较,评估 RALLD 治疗直肠癌的肿瘤学和长期结果。

方法

2002 年 9 月至 2014 年 10 月,收集了 426 例接受全直肠系膜切除加侧方淋巴结清扫术治疗原发性直肠癌患者的医疗数据。在数据收集后,排除了 115 例患者(IV 期,n=61;全盆腔切除术,n=31;多种癌症,n=20;常规腹腔镜手术,n=3)。在匹配前,分析了 311 例临床 II/III 期患者。通过精确匹配,将患者分为 RALLD(n=78)和 OLLD(n=78)组。比较两组的病理发现和长期结果。

结果

两组的病理分期和清扫淋巴结数量无显著差异。RALLD 组的阳性切缘率倾向于低于 OLLD 组(p=0.059)。156 例患者的中位随访时间为 54.0 个月。RALLD 组和 OLLD 组的 5 年总生存率分别为 95.4%和 87.8%(p=0.106)。RALLD 组和 OLLD 组的 5 年无复发生存率分别为 79.1%和 69.9%(p=0.157)。RALLD 组和 OLLD 组的 5 年局部无复发生存率分别为 98.6%和 90.9%(p=0.029)。

结论

短期和长期结果表明,RALLD 可能是局部进展期低位直肠癌的一种有用方法。

相似文献

1
Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced low rectal cancer.机器人辅助腹腔镜与开放外侧淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期低位直肠癌的肿瘤学结果。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4498-4505. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6197-x. Epub 2018 May 2.
2
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer.机器人辅助腹腔镜与开放手术治疗晚期低位直肠癌的侧方淋巴结清扫术对比
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):721-728. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4266-y. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
3
Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer.机器人辅助腹腔镜与腹腔镜下侧方淋巴结清扫术治疗中低位进展期直肠癌的短期疗效比较
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):5001-5008. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07979-6. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
4
Laparoscopic Versus Open Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer: A Subgroup Analysis of a Large Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan.腹腔镜与开放手术行局部进展期低位直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术:日本一项大型多中心队列研究的亚组分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Sep;60(9):954-964. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000843.
5
Postoperative morbidity and mortality after mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for clinical stage II or stage III lower rectal cancer (JCOG0212): results from a multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial.中低位直肠癌行直肠系膜切除术联合或不联合侧方淋巴结清扫的术后发病率和死亡率(JCOG0212):来自一项多中心、随机对照、非劣效性试验的结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jun;13(6):616-21. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70158-4. Epub 2012 May 15.
6
Is laparoscopic selective lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy safe?新辅助放化疗后,腹腔镜选择性侧方淋巴结清扫术用于局部进展期直肠癌是否安全?
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Nov;89(11):E492-E497. doi: 10.1111/ans.15449. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
7
Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is achievable and offers advantages as a minimally invasive surgery over the open approach.腹腔镜盆腔外侧淋巴结清扫术是可行的,作为一种微创手术,它比开放手术具有优势。
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1938-47. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4418-0. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
8
[Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].[机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术联合或不联合侧方淋巴结清扫治疗中低位进展期直肠癌的短期疗效:一项倾向评分匹配分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):370-376. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190725-00289.
9
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for locally advanced middle-low rectal cancer: Results of a multicentre lateral node study in China.腹腔镜与开腹选择性侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期中低位直肠癌的短期和长期疗效:中国多中心侧方淋巴结研究结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Nov;24(11):1325-1334. doi: 10.1111/codi.16223. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
10
Long-term clinical outcomes of total mesorectal excision and selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced low rectal cancer: a comparative study of a robotic versus laparoscopic approach.全直肠系膜切除术和选择性侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗晚期低位直肠癌的长期临床结局:机器人手术与腹腔镜手术方法的比较研究
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Apr;25(4):413-423. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02383-7. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Surgery for Rectal Cancer.直肠癌开放手术、腹腔镜手术及机器人辅助手术的短期和长期疗效
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2025 Apr 16;9(5):1017-1028. doi: 10.1002/ags3.70024. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Robotic Beyond Total Mesorectal Excision (bTME) for locally advanced and recurrent anorectal cancer: a systematic review.机器人辅助超全直肠系膜切除术(bTME)治疗局部晚期和复发性肛管直肠癌:一项系统评价
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 16;19(1):397. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02573-1.
3
Predictors of difficulty in robotic splenic flexure mobilization during rectal cancer surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2016 for the treatment of colorectal cancer.日本结直肠癌学会(JSCCR)2016年结直肠癌治疗指南。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb;23(1):1-34. doi: 10.1007/s10147-017-1101-6. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
2
Mesorectal Excision With or Without Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical Stage II/III Lower Rectal Cancer (JCOG0212): A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled, Noninferiority Trial.中下段直肠癌临床 II/III 期行直肠系膜全切除加或不加侧方淋巴结清扫术(JCOG0212):一项多中心、随机对照、非劣效性临床试验。
Ann Surg. 2017 Aug;266(2):201-207. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002212.
3
直肠癌手术中机器人脾曲游离困难的预测因素。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 May 17;40(1):122. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04916-8.
4
Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for middle or lower rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.机器人手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期和长期结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 May 16;40(1):121. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04888-9.
5
Comparison of short-term outcomes for robotic rectal surgery between the hinotori™ surgical robot system and da Vinci surgical system: a single-center retrospective study using propensity score matching analysis.Hinotori™手术机器人系统与达芬奇手术系统在机器人直肠手术短期结局的比较:一项使用倾向评分匹配分析的单中心回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2025 May 2. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11766-6.
6
A multicentre prospective single-arm clinical trial to evaluate the treatment outcomes of prophylactic laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer.一项多中心前瞻性单臂临床试验,旨在评估预防性腹腔镜下盆腔侧方淋巴结清扫术治疗晚期低位直肠癌的疗效。
Colorectal Dis. 2025 Apr;27(4):e70078. doi: 10.1111/codi.70078.
7
The Review of Modified Intersphincteric Resection in the Treatment of Ultra-Low Rectal Cancer.改良括约肌间切除术治疗超低位直肠癌的综述
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2025 Feb;26(2):84-91. doi: 10.1007/s11864-025-01291-y. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
8
Reversed anatomy in transanal lateral lymph node dissection: landmarks and pitfalls.经肛门侧方淋巴结清扫术中的逆向解剖:标志与陷阱
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Jan 23;29(1):54. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03083-2.
9
Advantages of Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision With Partial Prostatectomy Compared With Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术联合部分前列腺切除术与开放性手术治疗直肠癌的比较:一项单中心回顾性队列研究
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;18(1):e70003. doi: 10.1111/ases.70003.
10
Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic approaches in short- and long-term outcomes of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer: a Japanese multicenter study.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术在晚期直肠癌侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫短期和长期结局中的比较:一项日本多中心研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Dec 27;410(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03596-2.
Robotic Resection is a Good Prognostic Factor in Rectal Cancer Compared with Laparoscopic Resection: Long-term Survival Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching.
与腹腔镜切除术相比,机器人切除术是直肠癌的一个良好预后因素:使用倾向评分匹配的长期生存分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Mar;60(3):266-273. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000770.
4
Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期及肿瘤学结局比较
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2798-2807. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5289-8. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
5
Feasibility of Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision with Extended Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Lower Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.术前放化疗后腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除联合扩大盆腔侧方淋巴结清扫治疗晚期低位直肠癌的可行性
World J Surg. 2017 Mar;41(3):868-875. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3762-0.
6
Long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.新辅助放化疗后机器人与腹腔镜中低位直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术的长期肿瘤学结局
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1728-1737. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5165-6. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
7
A technique of laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection based on vesicohypogastric fascia and ureterohypogastric nerve fascia for advanced low rectal cancer.一种基于膀胱下腹筋膜和输尿管下腹神经筋膜的腹腔镜下盆腔外侧淋巴结清扫术治疗晚期低位直肠癌
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):945-948. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5014-7. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
8
Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.中低位直肠癌的全直肠系膜切除术:腹腔镜手术与机器人手术对比
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr 7;22(13):3602-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3602.
9
Oncologic Outcomes of Extended Robotic Resection for Rectal Cancer.直肠癌扩大机器人切除术的肿瘤学结局
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jul;23(7):2249-57. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5117-3. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
10
Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is achievable and offers advantages as a minimally invasive surgery over the open approach.腹腔镜盆腔外侧淋巴结清扫术是可行的,作为一种微创手术,它比开放手术具有优势。
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1938-47. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4418-0. Epub 2015 Aug 15.