Campens Cédric, Mousny Maryline, Docquier Pierre-Louis
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Acta Orthop Belg. 2010 Apr;76(2):226-32.
Three operative techniques for epiphysiodesis to correct lower limb length discrepancy (LLD) are compared: the Phemister technique, the percutaneous drilling-curettage technique and percutaneous epiphysiodesis using a transphyseal screw. Between 1987 and 2008, 92 patients with LLD were treated by surgical epiphysiodesis. Eighty patients were available for this retrospective study. No statistically significant difference was found between the three techniques concerning their efficiency in correction of lower limb length discrepancy. Percutaneous epiphysiodesis using a transphyseal screw appeared to be the best technique regarding mean operative time, mean hospitalisation time, postoperative pain and recovery of ambulation in the postoperative period. Complication rates were similar with the three techniques.
比较了三种用于骨骺阻滞术以纠正下肢长度差异(LLD)的手术技术:费米斯特技术、经皮钻孔刮除术和使用经骨骺螺钉的经皮骨骺阻滞术。1987年至2008年期间,92例下肢长度差异患者接受了手术骨骺阻滞术治疗。80例患者可用于这项回顾性研究。三种技术在纠正下肢长度差异的效率方面未发现统计学上的显著差异。就平均手术时间、平均住院时间、术后疼痛和术后行走恢复情况而言,使用经骨骺螺钉的经皮骨骺阻滞术似乎是最佳技术。三种技术的并发症发生率相似。