Gascoigne John
School of History and Philosophy, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Br J Hist Sci. 2009 Dec;42(155 Pt 4):539-62. doi: 10.1017/s0007087409002210.
This paper focuses on the response of the Royal Society to the increasing contact with parts of the globe beyond Europe. Such contact was in accord with the programme of Baconian natural history that the early Royal Society espoused, but it also raised basic questions about the extent and nature of the pursuit of natural history. In particular, the paper is concerned with the attention paid to one particular branch of natural history, the study of other peoples and their customs. Such scrutiny of other peoples in distant lands raised basic questions about what methods natural history should employ and the extent to which it could serve as a foundation for more general and theoretical claims. By taking a wide sweep from the beginnings of the Royal Society until the end of the eighteenth century it is hoped light will be shed on the changing understanding of natural history over this period.
本文聚焦于皇家学会对与欧洲以外全球各地日益增多的接触所做出的反应。这种接触符合早期皇家学会所拥护的培根式自然史计划,但同时也引发了关于自然史研究范围和本质的基本问题。特别是,本文关注对自然史一个特定分支的关注,即对其他民族及其习俗的研究。对遥远土地上其他民族的这种审视引发了关于自然史应采用何种方法以及它能在多大程度上作为更普遍和理论性主张的基础的基本问题。希望通过对从皇家学会成立之初到18世纪末的广泛考察,能揭示这一时期对自然史不断变化的理解。