Suppr超能文献

不同心电图标准在临床实践中检测左心室肥厚。Sara 研究的结果。

Detection of left ventricular hypertrophy by different electrocardiographic criteria in clinical practice. Findings from the Sara study.

机构信息

CS Rosa Luxemburgo, 5th Sanitary Area, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Exp Hypertens. 2010 May;32(3):145-53. doi: 10.3109/10641960903254455.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare the validity of different product duration-based electrocardiographic criteria with the classical voltage criteria and to estimate the prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) for each criterion. Electro cardiographic criteria from 248 hypertensive patients attended in daily clinical practice were examined. Cornell and Sokolow-Lyon voltage indexes, Cornell and Sokolow-Lyon products, and Cornell and Sokolow-Lyon areas were determined. The presence of echocardiographic LVH was documented from the patients' clinical records. The proportion of patients with LVH detected by Cornell product was 27.3% vs. 12.9% by Cornell voltage, and 23.6% by Sokolow-Lyon product vs. 12.0% by Sokolow voltage. Both were p < 0.05. When QRS area criteria were applied, ECG-LVH was present in 32.7% (Cornell area) and 29.5% (Sokolow area) of the patients, respectively. When the composite of several criteria was applied, the detection of LVH with the combination of the Cornell product and the Sokolow-Lyon voltage index increased to 33% and with the combination of Cornell and Sokolow-Lyon products reached 39.3%. Globally, the patients diagnosed by voltage criteria were older, had higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) and a longer history of hypertension when compared to subjects diagnosed by product or area-based criteria. The Cornell and Sokolow-Lyon product and the QRS area-based criteria improve the detection of ECG-LVH in the hypertensive population. The composite of different criteria may be a useful strategy to further increase the diagnostic ability of ECG. The combinations of the Cornell product with the Sokolow voltage or with the Sokolow product appear to be the most efficient options.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较不同基于产品持续时间的心电图标准与经典电压标准的有效性,并估计每个标准的左心室肥厚(LVH)的患病率。检查了 248 名在日常临床实践中就诊的高血压患者的心电图标准。确定了科耳尔和索洛洛-里昂电压指数、科耳尔和索洛洛-里昂乘积以及科耳尔和索洛洛-里昂面积。从患者的临床记录中记录了超声心动图 LVH 的存在。科耳尔产品检测到的 LVH 患者比例为 27.3%,而科耳尔电压为 12.9%,索洛洛-里昂产品为 23.6%,而索洛洛电压为 12.0%。两者均为 p<0.05。当应用 QRS 面积标准时,心电图-LVH 在 32.7%(科耳尔面积)和 29.5%(索洛洛面积)的患者中存在。当应用多个标准的组合时,科耳尔产品和索洛洛-里昂电压指数的组合将 LVH 的检出率提高到 33%,而科耳尔和索洛洛-里昂产品的组合则达到 39.3%。总体而言,与基于产品或面积的标准诊断的患者相比,基于电压标准诊断的患者年龄更大,收缩压(SBP)更高,高血压病史更长。科耳尔和索洛洛-里昂产品和 QRS 面积标准可提高高血压人群心电图-LVH 的检出率。不同标准的组合可能是进一步提高心电图诊断能力的有效策略。科耳尔产品与索洛电压或与索洛产品的组合似乎是最有效的选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验