Offodile Anaeze C, Balik Emre, Hoffman Aviad, Moon Victor, Baxter Raymond, Grieco Michael, Moradi Dovid, Kim Ik-yong, Nasar Abu, Cekic Vesna, Feingold Daniel L, Arnell Tracey D, Huang Emina, Whelan Richard L
New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia Campus, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Surg Innov. 2010 Jun;17(2):120-6. doi: 10.1177/1553350610366715.
There's no consensus about what defines a conversion for laparoscopic-assisted colorectal resection (LACR). This study's goal was to assess the utility of a strict incision length (IL) definition of conversion (incision > 7 cm) and compare it with results obtained when the surgeon determined (SD) if a LACR had been successfully completed.
The demographic and perioperative data for 580 elective LACRs were reviewed. The short-term outcomes for each conversion definition were determined and compared.
Conversion rates were 22% using the IL definition and 16% via the SD method. Both methods detected significant differences between completed and converted groups regarding the following: incision size, hospital stay, time to flatus, bowel movement, and regular diet as well as rate of wound infection and ileus. The IL method alone detected significant differences in the rate of pulmonary complications and BMI between the completed and converted groups.
The 2 methods yielded similar results for most parameters. The IL method better separated the patients in regard to 2 parameters. This method is objective and easy to apply; however, it may discriminate against obese patients whose extraction incisions are often longer. A conversion definition that considers BMI and IL is needed.
对于腹腔镜辅助结直肠切除术(LACR)中何为中转手术并无共识。本研究的目的是评估严格的切口长度(IL)定义(切口>7 cm)作为中转手术定义的实用性,并将其与外科医生判定(SD)LACR是否成功完成的结果进行比较。
回顾了580例择期LACR的人口统计学和围手术期数据。确定并比较了每种中转定义的短期结果。
采用IL定义的中转率为22%,通过SD方法的中转率为16%。两种方法均检测到完成手术组和中转手术组在以下方面存在显著差异:切口大小、住院时间、排气时间、排便、正常饮食以及伤口感染率和肠梗阻发生率。仅IL方法检测到完成手术组和中转手术组在肺部并发症发生率和体重指数方面存在显著差异。
两种方法在大多数参数上产生了相似的结果。IL方法在两个参数方面能更好地区分患者。该方法客观且易于应用;然而,它可能会对肥胖患者不利,因为他们的取出切口往往更长。需要一种考虑体重指数和切口长度的中转定义。