Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Amherst, NY 14260-4110, USA.
Psychol Med. 2011 Mar;41(3):575-88. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710001078. Epub 2010 May 27.
Although psychiatric diagnostic systems have conceptualized mania as a discrete phenomenon, appropriate latent structure investigations testing this conceptualization are lacking. In contrast to these diagnostic systems, several influential theories of mania have suggested a continuous conceptualization. The present study examined whether mania has a continuous or discrete latent structure using a comprehensive approach including taxometric, information-theoretic latent distribution modeling (ITLDM) and predictive validity methodologies in the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) study.
Eight dichotomous manic symptom items were submitted to a variety of latent structural analyses, including factor analyses, taxometric procedures and ITLDM, in 10105 ECA community participants. In addition, a variety of continuous and discrete models of mania were compared in terms of their relative abilities to predict outcomes (i.e. health service utilization, internalizing and externalizing disorders, and suicidal behavior).
Taxometric and ITLDM analyses consistently supported a continuous conceptualization of mania. In ITLDM analyses, a continuous model of mania demonstrated 6.52:1 odds over the best-fitting latent class model (LCM) of mania. Factor analyses suggested that the continuous structure of mania was best represented by a single latent factor. Predictive validity analyses demonstrated a consistent superior ability of continuous models of mania relative to discrete models.
The present study provided three independent lines of support for a continuous conceptualization of mania. The implications of a continuous model of mania are discussed.
尽管精神病学诊断系统将躁狂症概念化为一种离散现象,但缺乏对这种概念化进行适当潜在结构调查的研究。与这些诊断系统不同,躁狂症的一些有影响力的理论已经提出了连续的概念化。本研究采用包括分类分析、信息理论潜在分布建模(ITLDM)和预测有效性方法在内的综合方法,在流行病学抽样区(ECA)研究中检验了躁狂症是否具有连续或离散的潜在结构。
在 10105 名 ECA 社区参与者中,对 8 项二分躁狂症状条目进行了多种潜在结构分析,包括因子分析、分类分析程序和 ITLDM。此外,还比较了各种连续和离散的躁狂症模型,以评估它们预测结果(即卫生服务利用、内化和外化障碍以及自杀行为)的相对能力。
分类分析和 ITLDM 分析一致支持躁狂症的连续概念化。在 ITLDM 分析中,躁狂症的连续模型与躁狂症最佳拟合潜在类别模型(LCM)相比,优势比为 6.52:1。因子分析表明,躁狂症的连续结构最好由一个单一的潜在因素来表示。预测有效性分析表明,躁狂症的连续模型相对于离散模型具有一致的优越预测能力。
本研究提供了三种独立的证据支持躁狂症的连续概念化。讨论了躁狂症连续模型的意义。