The Department of Surgery, Emory University, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Can J Surg. 2010 Jun;53(3):184-8.
Tension pneumothorax requires emergent decompression. Unfortunately, some needle thoracostomies (NTs) are unsuccessful because of insufficient catheter length. All previous studies have used thickness of the chest wall (based on cadaver studies, ultrasonography or computed tomography [CT]) to extrapolate probable catheter effectiveness. The objective of this clinical study was to identify the frequency of NT failure with various catheter lengths.
We evaluated the records of all patients with severe blunt injury who had a prehospital NT before arrival at a level-1 trauma centre over a 48-month period. Patients were divided into 2 groups: helicopter (4.5-cm catheter sheath) and ground ambulance (3.2 cm) transport. Success of the NT was confirmed by the absence of a large pneumothorax on subsequent thoracic ultrasonography and CT.
Needle thoracostomy decompression was attempted in 1.5% (142/9689) of patients. Among patients with blunt injuries, the incidence was 1.4% (101/7073). Patients transported by helicopter (74%) received a 4.5-cm sheath. The remainder (26% ground transport) received a 3.2-cm catheter. A minority in each group (helicopter 15%, ground 28%) underwent immediate chest tube insertion (before thoracic ultrasound) because of ongoing hemodynamic instability. Failure to decompress the pleural space by NT was observed via ultrasound and/or CT in 65% (17/26) of attempts with a 3.2-cm catheter, compared with only 4% (3/75) of attempts with a 4.5-cm catheter (p < 0.001).
Tension pneumothorax decompression using a 3.2-cm catheter was unsuccessful in up to 65% of cases. When a larger 4.5-cm catheter was used, fewer procedures (4%) failed. Thoracic ultrasonography can be used to confirm NT placement.
张力性气胸需要紧急减压。不幸的是,由于导管长度不足,一些针式胸腔穿刺术(NT)并不成功。以往所有的研究都使用胸腔壁的厚度(基于尸体研究、超声或计算机断层扫描[CT])来推断导管的有效性。本临床研究的目的是确定不同导管长度下 NT 失败的频率。
我们评估了在 48 个月的时间内,所有在到达一级创伤中心之前在院前接受 NT 的严重钝性损伤患者的记录。患者分为两组:直升机(4.5cm 导管鞘)和地面救护车(3.2cm)转运。NT 的成功通过随后的胸部超声和 CT 证实没有大的气胸来确认。
在 9689 例患者中,有 1.5%(142 例)尝试进行 NT 减压。在钝性损伤患者中,发生率为 1.4%(101 例)。74%(直升机转运)的患者接受 4.5cm 鞘管,其余 26%(地面转运)接受 3.2cm 导管。每组中少数患者(直升机 15%,地面 28%)因持续的血流动力学不稳定而立即进行了胸腔管插入(在进行胸部超声之前)。通过超声和/或 CT 观察到,在 3.2cm 导管的 26 次尝试中,有 65%(17/26)未能减压,而在 4.5cm 导管的 75 次尝试中,只有 4%(3/75)失败(p <0.001)。
在多达 65%的情况下,使用 3.2cm 导管进行张力性气胸减压是不成功的。当使用更大的 4.5cm 导管时,失败的操作(4%)更少。胸腔超声可用于确认 NT 位置。