West Midlands Health Technology Assessment Collaboration, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14 Suppl 1:9-15. doi: 10.3310/hta14Suppl1/02.
This paper presents a summary of the evidence review group (ERG) report into the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of infliximab for the treatment of acute exacerbations of ulcerative colitis, in accordance with the licensed indication, based upon the manufacturer's submission to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) as part of the single technology appraisal process. The submitted clinical evidence included four randomised controlled trials (RCTs), two comparing infliximab with placebo in patients not responsive to initial treatment with intravenous corticosteroids and one comparing ciclosporin with placebo. A fourth RCT compared ciclosporin with intravenous corticosteroids as the initial treatment after hospitalisation. The manufacturer's submission concluded that infliximab provides clinical benefit to patients with acute severe, steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis and is well tolerated; it also provides additional clinical benefits over ciclosporin, particularly avoidance of colectomy. A decision tree model was built to compare infliximab with strategies involving ciclosporin, standard care and surgery. After correcting a small number of errors in the model, the revised base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for infliximab compared with standard care was 20,000 pounds. However, sensitivity analyses revealed considerable uncertainty emanating from the weight of the patient, the timeframe considered and, most importantly, the colectomy rates used. When a more appropriate mix of trials were included in the estimation of colectomy rates, the ICER for infliximab rose to 48,000 pounds. The guidance issued by NICE on 31 October 2008 states that infliximab is recommended as an option for the treatment of acute exacerbations of severely active ulcerative colitis only in patients in whom ciclosporin is contraindicated or clinically inappropriate, based on a careful assessment of the risks and benefits of treatment in the individual patient; for people who do not meet this criterion, infliximab should only be used for the treatment of acute exacerbations of severely active ulcerative colitis in clinical trials.
本文根据制造商向国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)提交的申请,概述了证据审查组(ERG)关于英夫利昔单抗治疗溃疡性结肠炎急性加重期的临床疗效和成本效益的报告,该申请符合许可证的规定,作为单一技术评估过程的一部分。提交的临床证据包括四项随机对照试验(RCT),其中两项比较了英夫利昔单抗与安慰剂在对初始静脉皮质激素治疗无反应的患者中的疗效,一项比较了环孢素与安慰剂的疗效,另一项比较了环孢素与静脉皮质激素作为住院后初始治疗的疗效。制造商的结论是,英夫利昔单抗为急性重度、皮质激素抵抗的溃疡性结肠炎患者提供了临床获益,且耐受性良好;与环孢素相比,它还提供了额外的临床获益,特别是避免了结肠切除术。建立了一个决策树模型来比较英夫利昔单抗与环孢素、标准治疗和手术的策略。在纠正了模型中的少量错误后,与标准治疗相比,英夫利昔单抗的修订基本情况增量成本效益比(ICER)为 20,000 英镑。然而,敏感性分析显示,来自患者体重、考虑的时间框架以及最重要的是使用的结肠切除术率的不确定性较大。当在估计结肠切除术率时纳入更合适的试验组合时,英夫利昔单抗的 ICER 上升至 48,000 英镑。NICE 于 2008 年 10 月 31 日发布的指南指出,只有在环孢素禁忌或临床不适用的情况下,才应将英夫利昔单抗推荐为严重活动溃疡性结肠炎急性加重期的治疗选择,前提是对个体患者的治疗风险和获益进行仔细评估;对于不符合该标准的患者,只有在临床试验中,英夫利昔单抗才可用于治疗严重活动溃疡性结肠炎的急性加重期。