• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[多水平模型在生物等效性评价中的应用(二)。]

[Application of multilevel models in the evaluation of bioequivalence (II).].

作者信息

Liu Qiao-lan, Shen Zhuo-zhi, Li Xiao-song, Chen Feng, Yang Min

机构信息

School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2010 Mar;31(3):333-9.

PMID:20510066
Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to explore the applicability of multivariate multilevel models for bioequivalence evaluation. Using an example of a 4 x 4 cross-over test design in evaluating bioequivalence of homemade and imported rosiglitazone maleate tablets, this paper illustrated the multivariate-model-based method for partitioning total variances of ln(AUC) and ln(C(max)) in the framework of multilevel models. It examined the feasibility of multivariate multilevel models in directly evaluating average bioequivalence (ABE), population bioequivalence (PBE) and individual bioequivalence (IBE). Taking into account the correlation between ln(AUC) and ln(C(max)) of rosiglitazone maleate tablets, the proposed models suggested no statistical difference between the two effect measures in their ABE bioequivalence via joint tests, whilst a contradictive conclusion was derived based on univariate multilevel models. Furthermore, the PBE and IBE for both ln(AUC) and ln(C(max)) of the two types of tablets were assessed with no statistical difference based on estimates of variance components from the proposed models. Multivariate multilevel models could be used to analyze bioequivalence of multiple effect measures simultaneously and they provided a new way of statistical analysis to evaluate bioequivalence.

摘要

本文的主要目的是探讨多变量多层次模型在生物等效性评价中的适用性。以4×4交叉试验设计为例,评估国产和进口马来酸罗格列酮片的生物等效性,本文阐述了在多层次模型框架下基于多变量模型的ln(AUC)和ln(C(max))总方差分解方法。研究了多变量多层次模型直接评估平均生物等效性(ABE)、群体生物等效性(PBE)和个体生物等效性(IBE)的可行性。考虑到马来酸罗格列酮片ln(AUC)和ln(C(max))之间的相关性,所提出的模型通过联合检验表明,两种效应指标在ABE生物等效性方面无统计学差异,而基于单变量多层次模型得出了矛盾的结论。此外,根据所提出模型的方差成分估计,评估了两种片剂ln(AUC)和ln(C(max))的PBE和IBE,无统计学差异。多变量多层次模型可用于同时分析多个效应指标的生物等效性,为生物等效性评价提供了一种新的统计分析方法。

相似文献

1
[Application of multilevel models in the evaluation of bioequivalence (II).].[多水平模型在生物等效性评价中的应用(二)。]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2010 Mar;31(3):333-9.
2
[Applying multilevel models in evaluation of bioequivalence (I)].[多层模型在生物等效性评价中的应用(I)]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Dec;30(12):1302-6.
3
Case studies, practical issues and observations on population and individual bioequivalence.关于群体和个体生物等效性的案例研究、实际问题及观察结果。
Stat Med. 2000 Oct 30;19(20):2811-20. doi: 10.1002/1097-0258(20001030)19:20<2811::aid-sim547>3.0.co;2-p.
4
Truncated areas under the curve in the assessment of pioglitazone bioequivalence. Data from a single-center, single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-way cross-over bioequivalence study of two formulations of pioglitazone 45 mg tablets under fasting conditions.在评估吡格列酮生物等效性时曲线下的截断面积。来自一项单中心、单剂量、随机、开放标签、两制剂双向交叉生物等效性研究的数据,该研究在空腹条件下对两种45毫克吡格列酮片剂制剂进行。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2011;61(1):32-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296165.
5
Kullback-Leibler divergence for evaluating bioequivalence.用于评估生物等效性的库尔贝克-莱布勒散度
Stat Med. 2003 Mar 30;22(6):913-30. doi: 10.1002/sim.1451.
6
Population and individual bioequivalence: lessons from real data and simulation studies.群体与个体生物等效性:来自真实数据和模拟研究的经验教训。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Aug;41(8):811-22. doi: 10.1177/00912700122010708.
7
Bayesian modeling of multivariate average bioequivalence.多变量平均生物等效性的贝叶斯建模
Stat Med. 2008 Jun 15;27(13):2402-19. doi: 10.1002/sim.3160.
8
[Bioequivalence assessment of pioglitazone hydrochloride oral preparation by limited sampling strategy].[采用有限采样策略对盐酸吡格列酮口服制剂进行生物等效性评价]
Yao Xue Xue Bao. 2006 Sep;41(9):893-8.
9
Comparison of average, scaled average, and population bioequivalence methods for assessment of highly variable drugs: an experience with doxifluridine in beagle dogs.平均、标准化平均和群体生物等效性方法评估高变异药物的比较:以比格犬中多西氟尿苷为例。
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2010 Jan 31;39(1-3):175-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2009.11.013. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
10
A three-step procedure for assessing bioequivalence in the general mixed model framework.在一般混合模型框架下评估生物等效性的三步程序。
Stat Med. 1996 Dec 30;15(24):2635-55. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19961230)15:24<2635::AID-SIM444>3.0.CO;2-X.