Prado Daniela Siqueira, Mota Vanessa Paula Lins Porto, Lima Tatiana Isabel Azevedo
Universidade Federal de Sergipe - UFS - Aracaju, SE, Brasil.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2010 Mar;32(3):139-43. doi: 10.1590/s0100-72032010000300007.
To identify if there is a difference in the prevalence of sexual dysfunction and in the sexual domain scores between a group of women attended at a public service and a group attended at a private service, and to investigate if there is an association between sexual dysfunction, family income and educational status.
Transversal study including 201 sexually active women aged from 18 to 45 years, 90 of them from a public service and 111 from private services. We evaluated age, marital status, use of hormonal contraception, income and educational status, and all women were submitted to the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), an instrument for the evaluation of their sexuality. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 15.0, was used for statistical analysis. The chi(2) test was applied for categorical variables and the Student's t-test to independent samples.
There was no significant difference regarding the prevalence of sexual dysfunction between groups (public versus private) (20 and 23.4%, p=0.5), or concerning the domain scores, desire (3.9+/-1.3 and 3.8+/-1.0, p=0.6), sexual arousal (4.5+/-0.8 and 4.4+/-0.9, p=0.5), lubrication (5.2+/-1.2 and 5.0+/-0.9, p=0.1), orgasm (5.0+/-1.2 and 4.9+/-1.1, p=0.5), satisfaction (5.2+/-1.2 and 5.1+/-1.0, p=0.9), and pain (5.3+/-1.1 and 5.2+/-1.0, p=0.8). Sexual dysfunction was detected in 28% of the women with income between two and four minimum wages, in 17.5% of those with an income of five wages or more, and in 14.3% among those with an income of one wage or less (p=0,1). The dysfunction occurred in 30.2% of women with elementary education, in 24.2% of those with high school education and in 13.4% of those with higher education (p=0.09).
There was no significant difference in the prevalence of sexual dysfunction or in the sexual domain scores between groups, nor was there an association with income or education status.
确定在公共服务机构就诊的一组女性与在私人服务机构就诊的一组女性之间性功能障碍患病率及性领域得分是否存在差异，并调查性功能障碍、家庭收入和教育状况之间是否存在关联。
横断面研究纳入了201名年龄在18至45岁之间的性活跃女性，其中90名来自公共服务机构，111名来自私人服务机构。我们评估了年龄、婚姻状况、激素避孕的使用情况、收入和教育状况，所有女性均接受了女性性功能指数（FSFI）评估，这是一种用于评估其性功能的工具。使用社会科学统计软件包第15.0版进行统计分析。分类变量采用卡方检验，独立样本采用学生t检验。
两组（公共服务机构与私人服务机构）之间性功能障碍患病率无显著差异（分别为20%和23.4%，p = 0.5），在各个领域得分方面也无差异，包括性欲（3.9±1.3和3.8±1.0，p = 0.6）、性唤起（4.5±0.8和4.4±0.9，p = 0.5）、润滑（5.2±1.2和5.0±0.9，p = 0.1）、性高潮（5.0±1.2和4.9±1.1，p = 0.5）、满意度（5.2±1.2和5.1±1.0，p = 0.9）以及疼痛（5.3±1.1和5.2±1.0，p = 0.8）。收入在两个至四个最低工资之间的女性中，28%存在性功能障碍；收入为五个或更多最低工资的女性中，17.5%存在性功能障碍；收入为一个或更少最低工资的女性中，14.3%存在性功能障碍（p = 0.1）。小学文化程度的女性中，30.2%存在性功能障碍；高中文化程度的女性中，24.2%存在性功能障碍；高等教育程度的女性中，13.4%存在性功能障碍（p = 0.09）。
两组之间性功能障碍患病率及性领域得分无显著差异，与收入或教育状况也无关联。
