• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节镜辅助下单束和双束胫骨嵌体重建治疗孤立性后交叉韧带损伤的比较。

A comparison of arthroscopically assisted single and double bundle tibial inlay reconstruction for isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Surg. 2010 Jun;2(2):76-84. doi: 10.4055/cios.2010.2.2.76. Epub 2010 May 4.

DOI:10.4055/cios.2010.2.2.76
PMID:20514264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2867202/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the clinical results of arthroscopically assisted single and double bundle tibial inlay reconstructions of an isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury.

METHODS

This study reviewed the data for 14 patients who underwent a single bundle tibial inlay PCL reconstruction (Group A) and 16 patients who underwent a double bundle tibial inlay PCL reconstruction (Group B) between August 1999 and August 2002. The mean follow-up period in groups A and B was 90.5 months and 64 months, respectively.

RESULTS

The Lysholm knee scores in groups A and B increased from an average of 43.3 +/- 7.04 and 44.7 +/- 5.02 preoperatively to 88.1 +/- 7.32 and 88.7 +/- 9.11 points at the final follow-up, respectively. In group A, stress radiography using a Telos device showed that the preoperative mean side-to-side differences (SSDs) of 9.5 +/- 1.60 mm at 30 degrees of flexion and 9.8 +/- 1.70 mm at 90 degrees of flexion were improved to 2.8 +/- 1.19 mm and 3.0 +/- 1.1 mm, respectively. In group B, the preoperative SSDs of 10.4 +/- 1.50 mm at 30 degrees of flexion and 10.7 +/- 1.60 mm at 90 degrees of flexion improved to 2.7 +/- 1.15 mm and 2.6 +/- 0.49 mm, respectively. There was no significant difference in the clinical scores and radiologic findings between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Single bundle and double bundle PCL reconstructions using the tibial inlay technique give satisfactory clinical results in patients with an isolated PCL injury, and there are no significant differences in the clinical and radiological results between the two techniques. These results suggest that it is unnecessary to perform the more technically challenging double bundle reconstruction using the tibial inlay technique in an isolated PCL injury.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了关节镜辅助下单独后交叉韧带(PCL)损伤的单束和双束胫骨镶嵌重建的临床结果。

方法

本研究回顾了 1999 年 8 月至 2002 年 8 月期间接受单束胫骨镶嵌 PCL 重建(A 组)和 16 例接受双束胫骨镶嵌 PCL 重建(B 组)的 14 例患者的数据。A 组和 B 组的平均随访时间分别为 90.5 个月和 64 个月。

结果

A 组和 B 组的 Lysholm 膝关节评分分别从术前平均 43.3 +/- 7.04 和 44.7 +/- 5.02 分增加到最终随访时的 88.1 +/- 7.32 和 88.7 +/- 9.11 分。在 A 组中,使用 Telos 设备进行的应力放射摄影显示,术前屈曲 30 度时平均侧到侧差异(SSD)为 9.5 +/- 1.60 毫米,屈曲 90 度时为 9.8 +/- 1.70 毫米,分别改善至 2.8 +/- 1.19 毫米和 3.0 +/- 1.1 毫米。在 B 组中,术前屈曲 30 度时 SSD 为 10.4 +/- 1.50 毫米,屈曲 90 度时为 10.7 +/- 1.60 毫米,分别改善至 2.7 +/- 1.15 毫米和 2.6 +/- 0.49 毫米。两组的临床评分和影像学结果无显著差异。

结论

使用胫骨镶嵌技术的单束和双束 PCL 重建在单独 PCL 损伤患者中可获得满意的临床结果,两种技术的临床和影像学结果无显著差异。这些结果表明,在单独的 PCL 损伤中,没有必要使用胫骨镶嵌技术进行更具技术挑战性的双束重建。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f3/2867202/685bbf346955/cios-2-76-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f3/2867202/724fc1680858/cios-2-76-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f3/2867202/8370614cc97c/cios-2-76-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f3/2867202/147ed77e9535/cios-2-76-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f3/2867202/685bbf346955/cios-2-76-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f3/2867202/724fc1680858/cios-2-76-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f3/2867202/8370614cc97c/cios-2-76-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f3/2867202/147ed77e9535/cios-2-76-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f3/2867202/685bbf346955/cios-2-76-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparison of arthroscopically assisted single and double bundle tibial inlay reconstruction for isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury.关节镜辅助下单束和双束胫骨嵌体重建治疗孤立性后交叉韧带损伤的比较。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2010 Jun;2(2):76-84. doi: 10.4055/cios.2010.2.2.76. Epub 2010 May 4.
2
Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up.采用单束髌腱移植并胫骨嵌体固定进行后交叉韧带重建:2至10年随访
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Mar;32(2):346-60. doi: 10.1177/0363546503261511.
3
Is the all-arthroscopic tibial inlay double-bundle PCL reconstruction a viable option in multiligament knee injuries?全关节镜下胫骨嵌体双束后交叉韧带重建术对于膝关节多韧带损伤是一种可行的选择吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Sep;472(9):2667-79. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3796-2.
4
Transtibial versus tibial inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: long-term follow-up study.经胫骨与胫骨嵌体技术用于后交叉韧带重建的长期随访研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Dec;42(12):2964-71. doi: 10.1177/0363546514550982. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
5
Comparison of a double bundle arthroscopic inlay and open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using clinically relevant tools: a cadaveric study.使用临床相关工具对双束关节镜下嵌入和开放嵌入后交叉韧带重建进行比较:一项尸体研究
Arthroscopy. 2008 Apr;24(4):472-80. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.09.012. Epub 2008 Jan 7.
6
Tensioning of remnant posterior cruciate ligament and reconstruction of anterolateral bundle in chronic posterior cruciate ligament injury.慢性后交叉韧带损伤中残余后交叉韧带的张力调整及前外侧束重建
Arthroscopy. 2006 Mar;22(3):329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.12.020.
7
Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up.单纯后交叉韧带重建中胫骨镶嵌与经胫骨技术的比较:至少2年随访
Arthroscopy. 2006 Mar;22(3):320-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.057.
8
Reconstruction of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a clinical comparison of the transtibial and tibial inlay techniques.孤立后交叉韧带损伤的重建:经胫骨技术与胫骨镶嵌技术的临床比较
Arthroscopy. 2006 Jan;22(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.038.
9
A novel posteromedial approach for tibial inlay PCL reconstruction in KDIIIM injuries: avoiding prone patient positioning.一种用于KDIIIM型损伤中胫骨嵌体后交叉韧带重建的新型后内侧入路:避免患者俯卧位
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Sep;472(9):2680-90. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3557-2.
10
Revision posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a modified tibial-inlay double-bundle technique.采用改良胫骨插块式双束技术行后交叉韧带重建翻修术。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Mar 21;94(6):516-22. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00030.

引用本文的文献

1
All-Inside PCL Reconstruction, Double Bundle, With Internal Brace Augmentation.全关节镜下后交叉韧带重建,双束,联合内置支撑增强术。
Arthrosc Tech. 2023 Jun 26;12(7):e1211-e1218. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.03.013. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Onlay Technique for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: The Paccola's Technique.后交叉韧带重建的覆盖技术:帕科拉技术。
Arthrosc Tech. 2023 Apr 24;12(5):e593-e602. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.12.013. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Global variation in isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

本文引用的文献

1
Double compared with single-bundle open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a cadaver model.在尸体模型中双束与单束开放式嵌体后交叉韧带重建的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep;90(9):1820-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01366.
2
A comparison of arthroscopic single- and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: review of 20 cases.关节镜下单束与双束后交叉韧带重建的比较:20例病例回顾
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2006 Dec;35(12):568-71.
3
Double-bundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a tendon-patellar bone-semitendinosus tendon autograft: clinical results with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up.
孤立后交叉韧带重建的全球差异。
J Exp Orthop. 2022 Oct 9;9(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s40634-022-00541-4.
4
Allogeneic umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell conditioned medium (secretome) for treating posterior cruciate ligament rupture: a prospective single-arm study.异体脐带间充质干细胞条件培养基(分泌组)治疗后交叉韧带断裂:一项前瞻性单臂研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Apr;33(3):669-675. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03278-z. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
5
Single versus double bundle in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction: a meta-analysis.单束与双束重建后交叉韧带(PCL):一项荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 9;12(1):4160. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07976-w.
6
Single and double bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction yield comparable clinical and functional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单束和双束后交叉韧带重建的临床和功能结果相当:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jul;30(7):2388-2399. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06907-6. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
7
Evolving evidence in the treatment of primary and recurrent posterior cruciate ligament injuries, part 2: surgical techniques, outcomes and rehabilitation.后交叉韧带初次及复发性损伤治疗中证据的演变,第 2 部分:手术技术、结果及康复。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Mar;29(3):682-693. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06337-2. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
8
Posterior cruciate ligament research output in asian countries from 2009 - 2019: A systematic review.2009年至2019年亚洲国家后交叉韧带的研究成果:一项系统评价。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Sep 12;59:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.006. eCollection 2020 Nov.
9
Modified tibial tunnel placement for single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduces the "Killer Turn" in a biomechanical model.改良胫骨隧道放置用于单束后交叉韧带重建可减少生物力学模型中的“致命转折”。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Dec;98(52):e18439. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018439.
10
Optimal management of posterior cruciate ligament injuries: current perspectives.后交叉韧带损伤的最佳管理:当前观点
Orthop Res Rev. 2017 Apr 5;9:13-22. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S113617. eCollection 2017.
采用髌腱-半腱肌肌腱自体移植进行双束经胫骨后交叉韧带重建:至少2年随访的临床结果
Arthroscopy. 2006 Dec;22(12):1331-1338.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.08.003.
4
Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up.单纯后交叉韧带重建中胫骨镶嵌与经胫骨技术的比较:至少2年随访
Arthroscopy. 2006 Mar;22(3):320-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.057.
5
Reconstruction of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a clinical comparison of the transtibial and tibial inlay techniques.孤立后交叉韧带损伤的重建:经胫骨技术与胫骨镶嵌技术的临床比较
Arthroscopy. 2006 Jan;22(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.038.
6
Clinical outcomes after isolated arthroscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.单纯关节镜下单束后交叉韧带重建后的临床疗效
Arthroscopy. 2005 Sep;21(9):1042-50. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.05.023.
7
A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using single- and double-bundle tibial inlay techniques.使用单束和双束胫骨嵌体技术进行后交叉韧带重建的生物力学比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2005 Jul;33(7):976-81. doi: 10.1177/0363546504273046. Epub 2005 May 11.
8
Arthroscopic single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using hamstring autograft.
Injury. 2004 Dec;35(12):1293-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.10.033.
9
Two-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how bundle tension depends on femoral placement.双束后交叉韧带重建:束张力如何取决于股骨放置位置。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jun;86(6):1262-70.
10
Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis of knee kinematics and graft in situ forces.胫骨镶嵌与经胫骨技术在后交叉韧带重建中的生物力学比较:膝关节运动学及移植物原位力分析
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Apr-May;32(3):587-93. doi: 10.1177/0363546503261717.