• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于受虐妇女决定维持暴力关系的政策捕捉调查。

A policy capturing investigation of battered women's decisions to stay in violent relationships.

作者信息

McDonough Tracy A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, College of Mount St. Joseph Cincinnati, OH 45233, USA.

出版信息

Violence Vict. 2010;25(2):165-84. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.25.2.165.

DOI:10.1891/0886-6708.25.2.165
PMID:20514815
Abstract

Based on theories of social exchange and cognitive decision-making, the current research was an initial attempt to analyze battered and nonbattered women's decision-making processes using a policy capturing methodology. Participants included 28 battered and 30 nonbattered women who responded to several questionnaires and vignettes about violent relationships. Overall, both groups of women reported they would be unlikely to stay in the described relationships. Further, the cue of violence intensity was overwhelmingly the most heavily weighted variable for women in both samples, and a comparison of subjective reports and objective policies found that both groups lacked insight into which variables they were weighing when deciding to stay. Results suggest that when making the intellectual decision to stay in an abusive relationship, battered and nonbattered women respond similarly.

摘要

基于社会交换理论和认知决策理论,当前的研究首次尝试采用政策捕捉方法来分析受虐妇女和未受虐妇女的决策过程。研究参与者包括28名受虐妇女和30名未受虐妇女,她们回答了几份关于暴力关系的问卷和短文。总体而言,两组女性都表示不太可能维持所描述的关系。此外,在两个样本中,暴力强度线索都是女性最看重的变量,主观报告与客观政策的比较发现,两组女性在决定是否维持关系时,都不清楚自己权衡了哪些变量。结果表明,在做出维持虐待关系的理智决定时,受虐妇女和未受虐妇女的反应相似。

相似文献

1
A policy capturing investigation of battered women's decisions to stay in violent relationships.一项关于受虐妇女决定维持暴力关系的政策捕捉调查。
Violence Vict. 2010;25(2):165-84. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.25.2.165.
2
Psychological abuse: implications for adjustment and commitment to leave violent partners.心理虐待:对摆脱暴力伴侣的适应及决心的影响
Violence Vict. 1999 Spring;14(1):55-67.
3
Coping and violence exposure as predictors of psychological functioning in domestic violence survivors.应对方式和暴力暴露作为家庭暴力幸存者心理功能的预测因素
Violence Against Women. 2006 Apr;12(4):340-54. doi: 10.1177/1077801206287285.
4
Factors associated with battered Filipino women's decision to stay in or leave an abusive relationship.与受虐菲律宾妇女决定留在或离开虐待关系相关的因素。
J Interpers Violence. 2014 Mar;29(4):575-92. doi: 10.1177/0886260513505709. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
5
Leave or stay? Battered women's decision after intimate partner violence.离开还是留下?亲密伴侣暴力后受虐妇女的抉择。
J Interpers Violence. 2008 Oct;23(10):1465-82. doi: 10.1177/0886260508314307. Epub 2008 Feb 28.
6
Breaking up is hard to do: psychological entrapment and women's commitment to violent dating relationships.分手很难:心理束缚与女性对暴力恋爱关系的投入。
Violence Vict. 2012;27(4):455-69. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.27.4.455.
7
College women's stay/leave decisions in abusive dating relationships: a prospective analysis of an expanded investment model.高校女生在受虐恋爱关系中的去留决定:对扩展投资模型的前瞻性分析。
J Interpers Violence. 2011 May;26(7):1446-62. doi: 10.1177/0886260510369131. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
8
Why does she leave? The leaving process(es) of battered women.她为何离开?受虐妇女的离开过程。
Health Care Women Int. 2008 Mar;29(3):200-26. doi: 10.1080/07399330801913802.
9
A lifetime of intimate partner violence: coping strategies of older women.亲密伴侣暴力的一生:老年女性的应对策略
J Interpers Violence. 2006 May;21(5):634-51. doi: 10.1177/0886260506286878.
10
Familial Power and Women's Contradictory Responses to Attitudinal Questions About Intimate Partner Violence in Rural Bangladesh.孟加拉国农村地区的家庭权力与女性对亲密伴侣暴力态度问题的矛盾回应
Violence Against Women. 2015 Oct;21(10):1171-93. doi: 10.1177/1077801215591632. Epub 2015 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision-Making and Abuse, What Relationship in Victims of Violence?决策与虐待:暴力受害者之间存在什么关系?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 19;20(10):5879. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105879.