• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Parole release decisions: impact of positive and negative victim and nonvictim input on a representative sample of parole-eligible inmates.

作者信息

Caplan Joel M

机构信息

Rutgers University, School of Criminal Justice, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.

出版信息

Violence Vict. 2010;25(2):224-42. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.25.2.224.

DOI:10.1891/0886-6708.25.2.224
PMID:20514818
Abstract

This study analyzed administrative data from the New Jersey State Parole Board to determine the extent to which victim and nonvictim input impacted parole release decisions. Positive and negative input, in both verbal and written forms, was studied for a representative sample of 820 parole-eligible adult inmates. Victim input was not found to be a significant predictor of parole release; measures of institutional behavior, crime severity, and criminal history were significant. Though insignificant, verbal input had a greater effect than written input. Results suggest that the impact of victim input is not generalizable across different types of offenders or across different paroling jurisdictions. It can no longer be assumed that victim rights laws and public participation at parole guarantee victim-desired outcomes.

摘要

相似文献

1
Parole release decisions: impact of positive and negative victim and nonvictim input on a representative sample of parole-eligible inmates.
Violence Vict. 2010;25(2):224-42. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.25.2.224.
2
Who is the victim anyway? The effects of bystander victim impact statements on mock juror sentencing decisions.到底谁才是受害者?旁观者受害者影响陈述对模拟陪审员量刑决定的影响。
Violence Vict. 2004 Jun;19(3):357-74. doi: 10.1891/vivi.19.3.357.65763.
3
Waiving away the chance of freedom: exploring why prisoners decide against applying for parole.放弃自由的机会:探究囚犯决定不申请假释的原因。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2014 Mar;58(3):320-47. doi: 10.1177/0306624X12470812. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
4
Victim Impact Statements: How Victim Social Class Affects Juror Decision Making.受害者影响陈述:受害者社会阶层如何影响陪审员的决策
Violence Vict. 2017 Jun 1;32(3):521-532. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-15-00187. Epub 2017 May 17.
5
Mental illness, criminal risk factors and parole release decisions.精神疾病、犯罪风险因素与假释释放决策。
Behav Sci Law. 2011 Jul-Aug;29(4):528-53. doi: 10.1002/bsl.991. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
6
Crime victims serving as jurors: is there bias present?犯罪受害者担任陪审员:是否存在偏见?
Law Hum Behav. 2004 Dec;28(6):649-59. doi: 10.1007/s10979-004-0792-1.
7
Standards to prevent, detect, and respond to sexual abuse and assault in confinement facilities. Final rule.
Fed Regist. 2014 Mar 7;79(45):13099-183.
8
Risk estimations of the conjunction of victim and crime event characteristics on the lethal outcome of sexual assaults.
Violence Vict. 2012;27(4):470-86. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.27.4.470.
9
Individual and institutional characteristics related to inmate victimization.与囚犯受害相关的个人和机构特征。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2010 Jun;54(3):378-94. doi: 10.1177/0306624X09335244. Epub 2009 Apr 27.
10
Perceptions of domestic violence and mock jurors' sentencing decisions.对家庭暴力的认知与模拟陪审员的量刑决定。
J Interpers Violence. 2007 Dec;22(12):1515-35. doi: 10.1177/0886260507306476.