University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52246, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Jun;92(6):1353-61. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00833.
Utilization of arthroplasty is increasing, but there are little data exploring the causes of this increase. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between new programs for arthroplasty of the lower extremity joints and the utilization of arthroplasty.
We identified twenty-four markets (hospital referral regions) that experienced the entry of new physician-owned specialty hospitals, using 1991 to 2005 Medicare data. We matched each market with a new specialty hospital to two different control markets (one market with a new arthroplasty program in a general hospital and one market without a new arthroplasty program), using a propensity score that accounted for market supply and demand for orthopaedic surgery and the regulatory environment. We compared the utilization of arthroplasty of the lower extremity joints (total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty) in each group of markets over a five-year window, extending from two years before to three years after the entry of new orthopaedic surgery programs.
The twenty-four markets with new specialty orthopaedic hospitals had higher utilization of arthroplasty at baseline (10.9 arthroplasties per 1000 Medicare beneficiaries per year) and follow-up (12.7 per 1000 beneficiaries) compared with the twenty-four markets with new arthroplasty programs in general hospitals (9.7 and 11.4, respectively) and the twenty-four markets with no new programs (9.9 and 11.3), although the differences were not significant (p > 0.05). Growth in the utilization of arthroplasty was similar in markets with new specialty hospitals before (an increase of 0.63 procedure per 1000 beneficiaries per year) and after the entry of new specialty hospitals (an increase of 0.39) compared with markets with new surgery programs in general hospitals (an increase of 0.24 before and 0.43 after) and markets with no new programs (an increase of 0.38 before and 0.33 after the entry of new specialty hospitals) (p > 0.05 for all comparisons).
The utilization of arthroplasty is increasing at similar rates in markets with and without new arthroplasty programs.
关节置换术的应用正在增加,但关于这种增长的原因的数据却很少。本研究的目的是探讨下肢关节置换新方案与关节置换应用之间的关系。
我们利用 1991 年至 2005 年的 Medicare 数据,确定了 24 个经历新的医生所有的专科医院进入的市场(医院转诊区域)。我们将每个市场与一家新的专科医院相匹配,与两个不同的对照市场(一个市场在综合医院开展了新的关节置换项目,另一个市场没有新的关节置换项目)进行匹配,使用一种倾向评分,该评分考虑了市场对矫形手术的供需情况和监管环境。我们比较了每个市场组在五年窗口(新的矫形手术项目进入前两年到进入后三年)中下肢关节(全髋关节置换术和全膝关节置换术)置换术的应用情况。
24 个有新专科骨科医院的市场在基线时(每年每 1000 名 Medicare 受益人的 10.9 例关节置换术)和随访时(每年每 1000 名受益人的 12.7 例)的关节置换术应用率均高于有新的综合医院开展的关节置换术的 24 个市场(分别为 9.7 和 11.4)和没有新项目的 24 个市场(分别为 9.9 和 11.3),尽管差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。在有新专科医院的市场中,关节置换术应用的增长在新医院进入之前(每年每 1000 名受益人的手术量增加 0.63 例)和之后(每年每 1000 名受益人的手术量增加 0.39 例)相似,而在有新的综合医院开展的手术项目的市场中(每年每 1000 名受益人的手术量分别增加 0.24 例和 0.43 例)和没有新项目的市场中(每年每 1000 名受益人的手术量分别增加 0.38 例和 0.33 例)也相似(所有比较均为 p > 0.05)。
在有和没有新关节置换项目的市场中,关节置换术的应用率以相似的速度增长。