Applied and Developmental Research Support Program, SAIC-Frederick, Inc., National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, MD, USA.
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2010 Jun;9(6):601-16. doi: 10.1586/erv.10.49.
The exact immunologic responses after vaccination that result in effective antitumor immunity have not yet been fully elucidated and the data from ex vivo T-cell assays have not yet defined adequate surrogate markers for clinical efficacy. A more detailed knowledge of the specific immune responses that correlate with positive clinical outcomes should help to develop better or novel strategies to effectively activate the immune system against tumors. Furthermore, clinically relevant material is often limited and, thus, precludes the ability to perform multiple assays. The two main assays currently used to monitor lymphocyte-mediated cytoxicity in cancer patients are the (51)Cr-release assay and IFN-gamma ELISpot assay. The former has a number of disadvantages, including low sensitivity, poor labeling and high spontaneous release of isotope from some tumor target cells. Additional problems with the (51)Cr-release assay include difficulty in obtaining autologous tumor targets, and biohazard and disposal problems for the isotope. The ELISpot assays do not directly measure cytotoxic activity and are, therefore, a surrogate marker of cyotoxic capacity of effector T cells. Furthermore, they do not assess cytotoxicity mediated by the production of the TNF family of death ligands by the cytotoxic cells. Therefore, assays that allow for the simultaneous measurement of several parameters may be more advantageous for clinical monitoring. In this respect, multifactor flow cytometry-based assays are a valid addition to the currently available immunologic monitoring assays. Use of these assays will enable detection and enumeration of tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and their specific effector functions and any correlations with clinical responses. Comprehensive, multifactor analysis of effector cell responses after vaccination may help to detect factors that determine the success or failure of a vaccine and its immunological potency.
接种疫苗后能有效产生抗肿瘤免疫的确切免疫反应尚未完全阐明,体外 T 细胞检测数据也尚未确定用于临床疗效的充分替代标志物。更详细地了解与积极临床结果相关的特定免疫反应,应该有助于制定更好或新的策略,以有效激活免疫系统对抗肿瘤。此外,临床相关材料通常是有限的,因此无法进行多次检测。目前用于监测癌症患者淋巴细胞介导的细胞毒性的两种主要检测方法是(51)Cr 释放检测和 IFN-γ ELISpot 检测。前者有许多缺点,包括灵敏度低、标记效果差以及一些肿瘤靶细胞同位素的自发释放较高。(51)Cr 释放检测还存在其他问题,包括难以获得自体肿瘤靶标以及同位素的生物危害和处理问题。ELISpot 检测不能直接测量细胞毒性活性,因此是细胞毒性效应 T 细胞细胞毒性能力的替代标志物。此外,它们不评估细胞毒性细胞通过产生 TNF 家族死亡配体介导的细胞毒性。因此,允许同时测量多个参数的检测方法可能更有利于临床监测。在这方面,基于多因子流式细胞术的检测方法是对当前可用的免疫监测检测方法的有效补充。使用这些检测方法将能够检测和计数肿瘤特异性细胞毒性 T 淋巴细胞及其特定的效应功能,以及与临床反应的任何相关性。接种疫苗后效应细胞反应的综合、多因子分析可能有助于检测决定疫苗成败及其免疫效力的因素。