• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 CD56 和 CD57 免疫染色在鉴别内分泌型导管原位癌和导管内乳头状瘤中的作用。

Evaluation of CD56 and CD57 immunostainings for discrimination between endocrine ductal carcinoma in situ and intraductal papilloma.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Pathology, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

Pathol Int. 2010 Jun;60(6):459-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2010.02544.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1827.2010.02544.x
PMID:20518901
Abstract

Endocrine ductal carcinoma in situ (E-DCIS) is an intraductal carcinoma characterized by endocrine features and expression of neuroendocrine markers. E-DCIS and intraductal papilloma (IDP) resemble in their clinical features. However, the former is an intraductal carcinoma, and the latter is an intraductal benign lesion. It is sometimes difficult to distinguish E-DCIS from IDP because both can show near solid intraductal cellular proliferation. Discrimination between lesions is important not only histopathologically, but also clinically. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of CD56 and CD57 for the discrimination between E-DCIS and IDP. Specimens were obtained from 17 E-DCIS patients as the subject group, and 27 IDP patients as the control group, diagnosed in St Marianna University Hospital. E-DCIS was diagnosed using Chromogranin A, Synaptophysin, and Grimelius stainings by the premise of histopathological features. These specimens were subjected to CD56, CD57 immunostainings. Staining results were compared between E-DCIS and IDP. In our study, CD56 revealed significant differences for distinguishing E-DCIS from IDP as determined by Fisher's test (cutoff: not less than 33-67%< immunopositivity, P < 0.05). We found that not only E-DCIS but also IDP revealed immunopositivity for CD56. However, it is considered that E-DCIS diagnosis is possible by diffuse immunopositivity of CD56 after having been based on histopathology.

摘要

内分泌型导管原位癌(E-DCIS)是一种具有内分泌特征和神经内分泌标志物表达的导管内癌。E-DCIS 和导管内乳头状瘤(IDP)在临床特征上相似。然而,前者是一种导管内癌,后者是一种导管内良性病变。有时很难将 E-DCIS 与 IDP 区分开来,因为两者都可以显示出类似实性的导管内细胞增殖。病变的鉴别不仅在组织病理学上很重要,而且在临床上也很重要。本研究旨在评估 CD56 和 CD57 在鉴别 E-DCIS 和 IDP 中的适用性。标本取自 17 例 E-DCIS 患者作为研究组,27 例 IDP 患者作为对照组,均在圣玛丽安娜大学医院诊断。E-DCIS 的诊断依据是组织病理学特征的嗜铬粒蛋白 A、突触素和格里姆利染色。对这些标本进行 CD56、CD57 免疫染色。比较 E-DCIS 和 IDP 之间的染色结果。在我们的研究中,Fisher 检验显示 CD56 在鉴别 E-DCIS 和 IDP 方面有显著差异(截断值:不少于 33-67%<免疫阳性率,P<0.05)。我们发现不仅 E-DCIS 而且 IDP 对 CD56 呈免疫阳性。然而,据认为,在基于组织病理学的基础上,CD56 的弥漫性免疫阳性可以进行 E-DCIS 诊断。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of CD56 and CD57 immunostainings for discrimination between endocrine ductal carcinoma in situ and intraductal papilloma.评估 CD56 和 CD57 免疫染色在鉴别内分泌型导管原位癌和导管内乳头状瘤中的作用。
Pathol Int. 2010 Jun;60(6):459-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2010.02544.x.
2
Combined evaluation of CK5/6, ER, p63, and MUC3 for distinguishing breast intraductal papilloma from ductal carcinoma in situ.CK5/6、ER、p63 和 MUC3 联合评估在鉴别乳腺导管内乳头状瘤与导管原位癌中的作用。
Pathol Int. 2012 Jun;62(6):381-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2012.02811.x. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
3
Solid papillary ductal carcinoma in situ versus usual ductal hyperplasia in the breast: a potentially difficult distinction resolved by cytokeratin 5/6.乳腺实性乳头状原位癌与普通导管增生:细胞角蛋白5/6解决的潜在难题鉴别
Hum Pathol. 2006 Jul;37(7):787-93. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.02.016. Epub 2006 May 26.
4
[Clinicopathologic study of breast cancer with features of endocrine ductal carcinoma-in-situ].具有内分泌导管原位癌特征的乳腺癌临床病理研究
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Oct;35(10):594-7.
5
Concomitant expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition biomarkers in breast ductal carcinoma: association with progression.在乳腺导管癌中上皮-间充质转化生物标志物的同时表达:与进展的关联。
Oncol Rep. 2010 Feb;23(2):313-20.
6
Ductal carcinoma in situ with spindle cells: a potential diagnostic pitfall in the evaluation of breast lesions.伴有梭形细胞的导管原位癌:乳腺病变评估中潜在的诊断陷阱。
Histopathology. 2004 Oct;45(4):343-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.01947.x.
7
Is CD56 a specific and reliable neuroendocrine marker for discriminating between endocrine/neuroendocrine ductal carcinoma in situ and intraductal papilloma of the breast?CD56是否是用于鉴别乳腺内分泌/神经内分泌导管原位癌与导管内乳头状瘤的特异性和可靠的神经内分泌标志物?
Pathol Int. 2011 Jan;61(1):49-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2010.02604.x.
8
A useful immunohistochemical approach to evaluate intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast and to predict their prognosis.一种评估乳腺导管内增生性病变并预测其预后的有用免疫组织化学方法。
Histol Histopathol. 2011 Jan;26(1):79-86. doi: 10.14670/HH-26.79.
9
Carcinoma in situ of the female breast. A clinico-pathological, immunohistological, and DNA ploidy study.女性乳腺原位癌。一项临床病理、免疫组织化学及DNA倍体研究。
APMIS Suppl. 2003(108):1-67.
10
CD24 expression in ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma of breast: an immunohistochemistry-based pilot study.乳腺导管原位癌和浸润性导管癌中CD24的表达:一项基于免疫组织化学的初步研究。
Pathol Res Pract. 2006;202(8):569-76. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2006.05.004. Epub 2006 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Differential distribution of immune cells in breast invasive carcinoma vs. breast carcinoma and its significance in interpretation of immune surveillance.乳腺浸润性癌与乳腺癌中免疫细胞的差异分布及其在免疫监视解读中的意义。
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2017 Jul 1;10(7):7743-7749. eCollection 2017.
2
The GDNF Family: A Role in Cancer?胶质细胞源性神经营养因子家族:在癌症中发挥作用?
Neoplasia. 2018 Jan;20(1):99-117. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Dec 12.