Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Diabetes Care. 2010 Sep;33(9):2018-20. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0572. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
To determine the impact of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) criteria on 1) gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis compared with the American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria and 2) the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) to predict GDM.
In 10,283 pregnant women undergoing a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for universal screening of GDM, two FPG thresholds (of the OGTT) were used to rule in and to rule out GDM.
The IADPSG and ADA criteria identified GDM in 3,875 (37.7%) women and 1,328 (12.9%) women, respectively (P < 0.0005). FPG thresholds of >or=5.1 mmol/l ruled in GDM in 2,975 (28.9%) women with 100% specificity, while <4.4 mmol/l ruled out GDM in 2,228 (21.7%) women with 95.4% sensitivity. FPG independently could have avoided the OGTT in 5,203 (50.6%) women.
The IADPSG criteria increased GDM prevalence nearly threefold. By circumventing a significant number of OGTTs, an initial FPG can greatly simplify the IADPSG diagnostic algorithm.
确定国际妊娠合并糖尿病研究组织(IADPSG)标准对以下方面的影响:1)与美国糖尿病协会(ADA)标准相比,对妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的诊断;2)空腹血糖(FPG)对 GDM 的预测。
在 10283 名接受 75g 口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)以进行 GDM 普遍筛查的孕妇中,使用两种 FPG 阈值(OGTT 中的)来确定 GDM 的确诊和排除。
IADPSG 和 ADA 标准分别在 3875 名(37.7%)和 1328 名(12.9%)女性中诊断出 GDM(P<0.0005)。FPG 阈值>或=5.1mmol/L 可确诊 2975 名(28.9%)女性的 GDM,特异性为 100%,而<4.4mmol/L 可排除 2228 名(21.7%)女性的 GDM,敏感性为 95.4%。FPG 可独立避免 5203 名(50.6%)女性进行 OGTT。
IADPSG 标准使 GDM 的患病率增加了近三倍。通过规避大量的 OGTT,初始 FPG 可以极大地简化 IADPSG 的诊断算法。